TPC-H Q02: DataFusion vs Polars comparison
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Área
- databases, performance
Línea de trabajo
Start with benchmarks/queries/q2.sql and the setup and plans in this issue; compare DataFusion's and Polars' execution of Q02 at SF1 and SF10. The issue points to the benchmark data and query, but does not identify a specific operator or code location to change. Done means locating and addressing the source of the performance gap, then reporting comparable timings for both scale factors.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Part of #26169, following the Q01 comparison in #27279. At SF1000, DataFusion was 5.42x slower than Polars on Q02 (results). This compares the two engines locally at SF1 and SF10.
Setup: the same as #27279. DataFusion main at 14b3edd9a and Polars main at pola-rs/polars@09251856d4 (streaming engine) run the same benchmarks/queries/q2.sql on the same Parquet files (SF10: part 2M rows, partsupp 8M, supplier 100K, one row group per file), on an Apple M5 Max (6 + 12 cores). Polars SQL and the polars-benchmark DataFrame version produce the same plan shape and take the same time (16.8 and 16.4 ms at SF10).
Plans
The join order is the same in both engines: part (filtered), partsupp, supplier, nation, region (filtered), which is the FROM order. The projections and scan filters are the same too. The plans differ in how the correlated subquery is decorrelated.
DataFusion logical and physical plan (SF10)
Sort: supplier.s_acctbal DESC NULLS FIRST, nation.n_name ASC NULLS LAST, supplier.s_name ASC NULLS LAST, part.p_partkey ASC NULLS LAST, fetch=100
Projection: supplier.s_acctbal, supplier.s_name, nation.n_name, part.p_partkey, part.p_mfgr, supplier.s_address, supplier.s_phone, supplier.s_comment
LeftSemi Join: part.p_partkey = __scalar_sq_1.ps_partkey, partsupp.ps_supplycost = __scalar_sq_1.min(partsupp.ps_supplycost)
Projection: part.p_partkey, part.p_mfgr, supplier.s_name, supplier.s_address, supplier.s_phone, supplier.s_acctbal, supplier.s_comment, partsupp.ps_supplycost, nation.n_name
Inner Join: nation.n_regionkey = region.r_regionkey
Projection: part.p_partkey, part.p_mfgr, supplier.s_name, supplier.s_address, supplier.s_phone, supplier.s_acctbal, supplier.s_comment, partsupp.ps_supplycost, nation.n_name, nation.n_regionkey
Inner Join: supplier.s_nationkey = nation.n_nationkey
Projection: part.p_partkey, part.p_mfgr, supplier.s_name, supplier.s_address, supplier.s_nationkey, supplier.s_phone, supplier.s_acctbal, supplier.s_comment, partsupp.ps_supplycost
Inner Join: partsupp.ps_suppkey = supplier.s_suppkey
Projection: part.p_partkey, part.p_mfgr, partsupp.ps_suppkey, partsupp.ps_supplycost
Inner Join: part.p_partkey = partsupp.ps_partkey
Projection: part.p_partkey, part.p_mfgr
Filter: part.p_size = Int32(15) AND part.p_type LIKE Utf8View("%BRASS")
TableScan: part projection=[p_partkey, p_mfgr, p_type, p_size], partial_filters=[part.p_size = Int32(15), part.p_type LIKE Utf8View("%BRASS")]
TableScan: partsupp projection=[ps_partkey, ps_suppkey, ps_supplycost]
TableScan: supplier projection=[s_suppkey, s_name, s_address, s_nationkey, s_phone, s_acctbal, s_comment]
TableScan: nation projection=[n_nationkey, n_name, n_regionkey]
Projection: region.r_regionkey
Filter: region.r_name = Utf8View("EUROPE")
TableScan: region projection=[r_regionkey, r_name], partial_filters=[region.r_name = Utf8View("EUROPE")]
SubqueryAlias: __scalar_sq_1
Projection: min(partsupp.ps_supplycost), partsupp.ps_partkey
Aggregate: groupBy=[[partsupp.ps_partkey]], aggr=[[min(partsupp.ps_supplycost)]]
Projection: partsupp.ps_partkey, partsupp.ps_supplycost
LeftSemi Join: nation.n_regionkey = region.r_regionkey
Projection: partsupp.ps_partkey, partsupp.ps_supplycost, nation.n_regionkey
Inner Join: supplier.s_nationkey = nation.n_nationkey
Projection: partsupp.ps_partkey, partsupp.ps_supplycost, supplier.s_nationkey
Inner Join: partsupp.ps_suppkey = supplier.s_suppkey
TableScan: partsupp projection=[ps_partkey, ps_suppkey, ps_supplycost]
TableScan: supplier projection=[s_suppkey, s_nationkey]
TableScan: nation projection=[n_nationkey, n_regionkey]
Projection: region.r_regionkey
Filter: region.r_name = Utf8View("EUROPE")
TableScan: region projection=[r_regionkey, r_name], partial_filters=[region.r_name = Utf8View("EUROPE")]
SortPreservingMergeExec: [s_acctbal@0 DESC, n_name@2 ASC NULLS LAST, s_name@1 ASC NULLS LAST, p_partkey@3 ASC NULLS LAST], fetch=100
SortExec: TopK(fetch=100), expr=[s_acctbal@0 DESC, n_name@2 ASC NULLS LAST, s_name@1 ASC NULLS LAST, p_partkey@3 ASC NULLS LAST], preserve_partitioning=[true]
HashJoinExec: mode=Partitioned, join_type=LeftSemi, on=[(p_partkey@0, ps_partkey@1), (ps_supplycost@7, min(partsupp.ps_supplycost)@0)], projection=[s_acctbal@5, s_name@2, n_name@8, p_partkey@0, p_mfgr@1, s_address@3, s_phone@4, s_comment@6]
RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([p_partkey@0, ps_supplycost@7], 18), input_partitions=18
HashJoinExec: mode=CollectLeft, join_type=Inner, on=[(r_regionkey@0, n_regionkey@9)], projection=[p_partkey@1, p_mfgr@2, s_name@3, s_address@4, s_phone@5, s_acctbal@6, s_comment@7, ps_supplycost@8, n_name@9]
CoalescePartitionsExec
FilterExec: r_name@1 = EUROPE, projection=[r_regionkey@0]
RepartitionExec: partitioning=RoundRobinBatch(18), input_partitions=1
DataSourceExec: file_groups={1 groups: [[tpch_sf10/region/part-0.parquet], ...]}, projection=[r_regionkey, r_name], file_type=parquet, predicate=r_name@1 = EUROPE, pruning_predicate=r_name_null_count@2 != row_count@3 AND r_name_min@0 <= EUROPE AND EUROPE <= r_name_max@1, required_guarantees=[r_name in (EUROPE)]
HashJoinExec: mode=CollectLeft, join_type=Inner, on=[(n_nationkey@0, s_nationkey@4)], projection=[p_partkey@3, p_mfgr@4, s_name@5, s_address@6, s_phone@8, s_acctbal@9, s_comment@10, ps_supplycost@11, n_name@1, n_regionkey@2]
DataSourceExec: file_groups={1 groups: [[tpch_sf10/nation/part-0.parquet], ...]}, projection=[n_nationkey, n_name, n_regionkey], file_type=parquet, predicate=DynamicFilter [ empty ], dynamic_rg_pruning=eligible
HashJoinExec: mode=CollectLeft, join_type=Inner, on=[(s_suppkey@0, ps_suppkey@2)], projection=[p_partkey@7, p_mfgr@8, s_name@1, s_address@2, s_nationkey@3, s_phone@4, s_acctbal@5, s_comment@6, ps_supplycost@10]
CoalescePartitionsExec
DataSourceExec: file_groups={18 groups: [[tpch_sf10/supplier/part-0.parquet:0..349257], ...]}, projection=[s_suppkey, s_name, s_address, s_nationkey, s_phone, s_acctbal, s_comment], file_type=parquet, predicate=DynamicFilter [ empty ], dynamic_rg_pruning=eligible
HashJoinExec: mode=Partitioned, join_type=Inner, on=[(p_partkey@0, ps_partkey@0)], projection=[p_partkey@0, p_mfgr@1, ps_suppkey@3, ps_supplycost@4]
RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([p_partkey@0], 18), input_partitions=18
FilterExec: p_size@3 = 15 AND p_type@2 LIKE %BRASS, projection=[p_partkey@0, p_mfgr@1]
DataSourceExec: file_groups={18 groups: [[tpch_sf10/part/part-0.parquet:0..2809848], ...]}, projection=[p_partkey, p_mfgr, p_type, p_size], file_type=parquet, predicate=p_size@5 = 15 AND p_type@4 LIKE %BRASS, pruning_predicate=p_size_null_count@2 != row_count@3 AND p_size_min@0 <= 15 AND 15 <= p_size_max@1, required_guarantees=[p_size in (15)]
RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([ps_partkey@0], 18), input_partitions=18
DataSourceExec: file_groups={18 groups: [[tpch_sf10/partsupp/part-0.parquet:0..17473198], ...]}, projection=[ps_partkey, ps_suppkey, ps_supplycost], file_type=parquet, predicate=DynamicFilter [ empty ] AND DynamicFilter [ empty ], dynamic_rg_pruning=eligible
RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([ps_partkey@1, min(partsupp.ps_supplycost)@0], 18), input_partitions=18
ProjectionExec: expr=[min(partsupp.ps_supplycost)@1 as min(partsupp.ps_supplycost), ps_partkey@0 as ps_partkey]
AggregateExec: mode=FinalPartitioned, gby=[ps_partkey@0 as ps_partkey], aggr=[min(partsupp.ps_supplycost)]
RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([ps_partkey@0], 18), input_partitions=18
AggregateExec: mode=Partial, gby=[ps_partkey@0 as ps_partkey], aggr=[min(partsupp.ps_supplycost)]
HashJoinExec: mode=CollectLeft, join_type=RightSemi, on=[(r_regionkey@0, n_regionkey@2)], projection=[ps_partkey@0, ps_supplycost@1]
CoalescePartitionsExec
FilterExec: r_name@1 = EUROPE, projection=[r_regionkey@0]
RepartitionExec: partitioning=RoundRobinBatch(18), input_partitions=1
DataSourceExec: file_groups={1 groups: [[tpch_sf10/region/part-0.parquet], ...]}, projection=[r_regionkey, r_name], file_type=parquet, predicate=r_name@1 = EUROPE, pruning_predicate=r_name_null_count@2 != row_count@3 AND r_name_min@0 <= EUROPE AND EUROPE <= r_name_max@1, required_guarantees=[r_name in (EUROPE)]
HashJoinExec: mode=CollectLeft, join_type=Inner, on=[(n_nationkey@0, s_nationkey@2)], projection=[ps_partkey@2, ps_supplycost@3, n_regionkey@1]
DataSourceExec: file_groups={1 groups: [[tpch_sf10/nation/part-0.parquet], ...]}, projection=[n_nationkey, n_regionkey], file_type=parquet, predicate=DynamicFilter [ empty ], dynamic_rg_pruning=eligible
HashJoinExec: mode=CollectLeft, join_type=Inner, on=[(s_suppkey@0, ps_suppkey@1)], projection=[ps_partkey@2, ps_supplycost@4, s_nationkey@1]
CoalescePartitionsExec
DataSourceExec: file_groups={18 groups: [[tpch_sf10/supplier/part-0.parquet:0..349257], ...]}, projection=[s_suppkey, s_nationkey], file_type=parquet, predicate=DynamicFilter [ empty ], dynamic_rg_pruning=eligible
DataSourceExec: file_groups={18 groups: [[tpch_sf10/partsupp/part-0.parquet:0..17473198], ...]}, projection=[ps_partkey, ps_suppkey, ps_supplycost], file_type=parquet, predicate=DynamicFilter [ empty ], dynamic_rg_pruning=eligible
Polars optimized and physical plan (SF10)
SORT BY [slice: (0, 100, dynamic_pred: f0fbee75-90c3-4d22-881d-4a84dc4b5d7e), descending: [true, false, false, false], nulls_last: [false, true, true, true]] [col("s_acctbal"), col("n_name"), col("s_name"), col("p_partkey")]
simple π 8/8 ["s_acctbal", "s_name", ... 6 other columns]
WITH_COLUMNS:
[col("s_acctbal"), col("s_name"), col("n_name"), col("p_partkey"), col("p_mfgr"), col("s_address"), col("s_phone"), col("s_comment")]
simple π 8/8 ["p_partkey", "p_mfgr", ... 6 other columns]
INNER JOIN:
LEFT PLAN ON: [col("p_partkey"), col("ps_supplycost")]
FILTER col("s_acctbal").dynamic_predicate()
FROM
CACHE[id: 4530fe76-0c6a-42e9-8dce-f3fbf64f6804]
simple π 9/9 ["p_partkey", "p_mfgr", ... 7 other columns]
INNER JOIN:
LEFT PLAN ON: [col("n_regionkey")]
simple π 10/10 ["p_partkey", "p_mfgr", ... 8 other columns]
INNER JOIN:
LEFT PLAN ON: [col("s_nationkey")]
simple π 9/9 ["p_partkey", "p_mfgr", ... 7 other columns]
INNER JOIN:
LEFT PLAN ON: [col("ps_suppkey")]
simple π 4/4 ["p_partkey", "p_mfgr", ... 2 other columns]
INNER JOIN:
LEFT PLAN ON: [col("p_partkey")]
simple π 2/2 ["p_partkey", "p_mfgr"]
Parquet SCAN [tpch_sf10/part/part-0.parquet, ... 15 other sources]
PROJECT 4/9 COLUMNS
SELECTION: (col("p_size") == 15) & col("p_type").str.ends_with(["BRASS"])
ESTIMATED ROWS: 2000000
RIGHT PLAN ON: [col("ps_partkey")]
Parquet SCAN [tpch_sf10/partsupp/part-0.parquet, ... 15 other sources]
PROJECT 3/5 COLUMNS
ESTIMATED ROWS: 8000000
END INNER JOIN
RIGHT PLAN ON: [col("s_suppkey")]
Parquet SCAN [tpch_sf10/supplier/part-0.parquet, ... 15 other sources]
PROJECT */7 COLUMNS
ESTIMATED ROWS: 100000
END INNER JOIN
RIGHT PLAN ON: [col("n_nationkey")]
Parquet SCAN [tpch_sf10/nation/part-0.parquet]
PROJECT 3/4 COLUMNS
ESTIMATED ROWS: 25
END INNER JOIN
RIGHT PLAN ON: [col("r_regionkey")]
simple π 1/1 ["r_regionkey"]
Parquet SCAN [tpch_sf10/region/part-0.parquet]
PROJECT 2/3 COLUMNS
SELECTION: col("r_name") == "EUROPE"
ESTIMATED ROWS: 5
END INNER JOIN
RIGHT PLAN ON: [col("p_partkey"), col("__POLARS_CORR__POLARS_TMP_SQL_2_res").alias("__POLARS_JOIN_KEY_0___POLARS_CORR__POLARS_TMP_SQL_2_res")]
AGGREGATE[maintain_order: false]
[col("ps_supplycost").min().alias("__POLARS_CORR__POLARS_TMP_SQL_2_res")] BY [col("p_partkey")]
FROM
simple π 2/2 ["p_partkey", "ps_supplycost"]
CACHE[id: 4530fe76-0c6a-42e9-8dce-f3fbf64f6804]
END INNER JOIN
Streaming physical plan, from POLARS_VISUALIZE_PHYSICAL_PLAN (_NN stands for _POLARS_TMP_PHYS_NN, the table names are added):
in-memory-sink
select: s_acctbal, s_name, n_name, p_partkey, p_mfgr, s_address, s_phone, s_comment
sort: _19 = col("s_acctbal").row_encode([col("n_name"), col("s_name"), col("p_partkey")])
top-k: by s_acctbal, n_name, s_name, p_partkey, k = 100
select: s_acctbal, s_name, n_name, p_partkey, p_mfgr, s_address, s_phone, s_comment
equi-join INNER: left_on=[p_partkey, ps_supplycost], right_on=[p_partkey, __POLARS_CORR__POLARS_TMP_SQL_6_res]
filter: col("s_acctbal").dynamic_predicate()
multiplexer M
select: p_partkey, __POLARS_CORR__POLARS_TMP_SQL_6_res = _18
group-by: key=[p_partkey], aggs=[_18 = col("ps_supplycost").min()]
select: p_partkey, ps_supplycost
multiplexer M
multiplexer M (the outer join, computed once)
select: p_partkey, p_mfgr, s_name, s_address, s_phone, s_acctbal, s_comment, n_name, ps_supplycost
equi-join INNER: n_regionkey = r_regionkey
equi-join INNER: s_nationkey = n_nationkey
equi-join INNER: ps_suppkey = s_suppkey
equi-join INNER: p_partkey = ps_partkey
multi-scan[parquet] (part): 16 sources, project: 4, filter: (col("p_size") == 15) & col("p_type").str.ends_with(["BRASS"])
multi-scan[parquet] (partsupp): 16 sources, project: 3, filter: col("ps_partkey").dynamic_predicate() & col("ps_partkey").dynamic_predicate()
multi-scan[parquet] (supplier): 16 sources, project: 7
multi-scan[parquet] (nation): 1 source, project: 3
select: r_regionkey
multi-scan[parquet] (region): 1 source, project: 2, filter: col("r_name") == "EUROPE"
Timings per finding
SF10. The wall times in finding 1 come from datafusion-cli for both DataFusion columns. The CPU rows come from EXPLAIN ANALYZE for DataFusion and POLARS_LOG_METRICS for Polars, with 18 threads.
| DataFusion | Polars | |
|---|---|---|
1. Decorrelation: q2.sql / the Polars plan written as DataFusion SQL, 18 threads |
39.0 / 21.0 ms | 16.8 ms |
| 1. The same, 1 thread | 294 / 120 ms | 102 ms |
| 1. CPU of the subquery side | 246 ms | 0.6 ms |
2. CPU of the outer partsupp scan and probe: default / pushdown_filters = true |
127 / 165 ms | 76 ms |
Total timing
Median ms.
| DataFusion | Polars | DataFusion / Polars | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SF1, 18 threads | 8.9 | 9.2 | 0.97x |
| SF10, 18 threads | 37.3 | 16.8 | 2.22x |
| SF10, 1 thread | 290 | 102 | 2.84x |
With 18 threads at SF10, DataFusion uses about 415 ms of CPU and Polars 126 ms.
Findings
- The decorrelated aggregate covers every part.
scalar_subquery_to_jointurns the subquery into aLeftSemijoin againstmin(ps_supplycost)grouped byps_partkeyover every EUROPE supplier. That is a secondpartsuppscan (8M rows), three joins and 1.18M groups, while the outer side has 6.35K rows. The semi join's dynamic filter covers both join keys, one of them the aggregate output, andAggregateExeconly forwards filters on grouping columns. So the subquery'spartsuppscan only gets the filter from thesupplierjoin. Polars SQL sees that the subquery repeats the outer join tree and reads the minimum from the cached outer join (pola-rs/polars#29685). Its fallback restricts the subquery input to the outer keys with a semi join (pola-rs/polars#29383). Writing the Polars plan in DataFusion SQL, with the outer join as aMATERIALIZEDCTE, returns the same 100 rows in 21.0 ms. #26218 (PushDownSemiJoin, which semi joins the aggregate input with the filtered scan of the outer keys and cites TPC-H Q2) potentially targets this. #8777 covers sharing repeated subplans. - Join dynamic filters only prune row groups. The outer
partsuppscan getsps_partkey >= 249 AND ps_partkey <= 1999754 AND hash_lookup. With the defaultpushdown_filters = falseit prunes nothing, so all 8M rows are decoded and probed (andnationreturns 25 rows, not 5). Withpushdown_filters = truethe scan returns 31.4K rows but costs more CPU (164 ms, of whichrow_pushdown_eval_timeis 62 ms). Polars publishes a key range plus a bitset over the 8K build keys and applies it while decoding, so its scan returns the same 31.4K rows for 71 ms. The pushdown cost is tracked in #20324.
All numbers are from a local machine, not the SF1000 S3 setup. SF1 shows no gap.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 9.6k
- Forks
- 2.6k
- Merge medio
- 3 d 4 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 345
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de apache/datafusion
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
apache/datafusion#27315 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
apache/datafusion#27094 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Substrait consumer doesn't recognise `shift_left` / `shift_right` from functions_arithmetic.yamlPosiblemente ocupada @jonasHanhan la tomó hace 9 días. Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
apache/datafusion#27059 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
`ProjectionExprs::project_statistics` computes approximate `Statistics::total_byte_size` ignoring column statsPosiblemente ocupada @joseph-isaacs la tomó hace 9 días. Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
apache/datafusion#27050 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
physical-plan: decoding an Unnest or Explain node with an unset field panicsPosiblemente ocupada @geoHeil la tomó hace 8 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
apache/datafusion#26999 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de apache/datafusion
Issues similares
-
area:schema documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
ElectronicWave/Elemental#252 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
dekobon/big-code-analysis#1887 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Shell中文符号输入异常Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día