CKS: nothing detects drift between a cluster's VM map, its VMs and its Kubernetes nodes
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
@bhouse-nexthop ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 10/11/2026.
- #14666 de @bhouse-nexthop — abierto
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 42/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- java, kubernetes
- Área
- cloud, observability
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading the CKS cluster status scanner and its handling of cluster VMs, then trace how it can access the cluster's Kubernetes nodes and raise alerts and events. Compare the VM map, actual VMs, and Kubernetes nodes for each mismatch. Done means each mismatch produces an alert and event naming the cluster and affected VM or node once, without changing the map.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
problem
CKS keeps the list of VMs of each Kubernetes cluster in kubernetes_cluster_vm_map. Scale, upgrade, stop/start and the cluster status scanner all trust that list. Nothing checks it against the VMs that actually exist or against the nodes Kubernetes knows about, so when the two drift apart nobody is told:
- a VM that is in the map but has been destroyed or expunged, or no longer exists, keeps the cluster in Alert (the scanner compares the map's size and VM states against the expected node count), and the next scale or upgrade works from a wrong list;
- a VM that runs as a node of the cluster but is not in the map is invisible to CloudStack: it is not scaled, upgraded, stopped or deleted with the cluster;
- a Kubernetes node with no VM behind it, or a mapped running VM that is not a Kubernetes node, means the cluster Kubernetes runs is not the one CloudStack thinks it manages.
The API and UI refuse to destroy a VM that belongs to a CKS cluster, so the map does not drift through normal use. It drifts when:
- a node is rebuilt or replaced by hand (a new VM joined to the cluster, the old one removed outside CKS);
- the database is edited by hand;
- a destroy or expunge fails during a scale-down, which removed the VM from the map but could leave the VM behind. That path is fixed in #14611.
A production cluster was found sitting in Alert with one of its control nodes missing from the map. The only way to find out why was to compare the map, the VMs and kubectl get nodes by hand.
versions
4.22 and main.
The steps to reproduce the bug
- Create a CKS cluster and wait for it to be Running.
- Remove one of its rows from
kubernetes_cluster_vm_map(or replace a worker node by hand with a new VM that joins the cluster). - The cluster moves to Alert, or keeps a node CloudStack does not know about, and no alert or event says which VM or node is the cause.
What to do about it?
Have the cluster status scanner compare the map with the cluster's VMs and its Kubernetes nodes, and raise an alert and an event naming the cluster and the VM or node for each mismatch, once per mismatch. Detection only, the map is not changed.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Java
- Estrellas
- 3.1k
- Forks
- 1.4k
- Merge medio
- 7 d 16 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 15
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de apache/cloudstack
-
resizeVolume of a running system VM's volume is accepted but the VM never sees the new sizePosiblemente ocupada @bhouse-nexthop la tomó hace 3 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
apache/cloudstack#14645 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
VR reports a load balancer change as applied when haproxy.cfg cannot be replacedPosiblemente ocupada @bhouse-nexthop la tomó hace 4 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
apache/cloudstack#14633 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
restartNetwork reports a ResourceUnavailableException as an unexpected error (530), unlike restartVPC (534)Posiblemente ocupada @bhouse-nexthop la tomó hace 4 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
apache/cloudstack#14631 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
apache/cloudstack#14625 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Remote access VPN users are disconnected on every LB, ACL, port forward or firewall change (xl2tpd restarted on every iptables pass)Posiblemente ocupada @willbennett-devops la tomó hace 12 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
apache/cloudstack#14545 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de apache/cloudstack
Issues similares
-
[FEATURE] Expose external refresh, node-level translog and warmer statsPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abiertountriaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
opensearch-project/opensearch-prometheus-exporter#680 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
bug
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
Good First Issue
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
hiero-ledger/hiero-sdk-java#3059 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día