DNS Framework: tenants cannot own DNS servers or vanity zones (no account/domainid on addDnsServer/createDnsZone)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- java
- Área
- backend-api-design
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading the DNS Framework API definitions and permission checks for addDnsServer and createDnsZone, then trace how DNS server and zone ownership and public suffixes are handled. The issue proposes several alternative changes, including tenant ownership, domain admin access, and suffix rules, so first agree on scope with maintainers. Done means tenants can manage delegated vanity zones under the agreed ownership and access rules without receiving the PowerDNS API key.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
ISSUE TYPE
- Improvement Request / Bug Report
COMPONENT NAME
DNS Framework (PowerDNS provider), API, UI
CLOUDSTACK VERSION
4.23.0.0
SUMMARY
The new DNS Framework works well for provider-owned zones, but in a multi-tenant
cloud there is no way for a tenant to manage a zone for a domain they own
(e.g. customer.com). Every tenant zone is forced under the public server's
suffix, and the admin cannot create a server entry or zone on a tenant's behalf.
OBSERVED BEHAVIOUR
addDnsServercalled by a non-root account fails with
"This API can only be called by root admin".
The documentation states that admins and domain admins can create public
DNS servers, so either the docs or the permission check is wrong.- Only one DNS server entry per account + URL is allowed
("This Account already has a DNS server integration for URL: ..."). addDnsServerandcreateDnsZonehave noaccount,domainidor
projectidparameters (verified withlist apis ... filter=params),
so root cannot create a server entry or zone owned by a tenant.- Zones created by root are owned by root and are not visible to tenants.
- Tenants creating zones on a public server are always restricted to the
singlepublicdomainsuffix.
Result: a tenant who owns customer.com and delegates it to our nameservers
cannot manage that zone through CloudStack. The only workarounds are manual
management by root, a separate DNS UI outside CloudStack, or CNAMEs from the
vanity zone into a suffixed tenant zone.
USE CASE
- Provider runs a PowerDNS cluster and wants to offer managed DNS to tenants.
- Default: tenants self-serve zones under
cloud.provider.example
(works today). - Some tenants own their own domains (
customer.com), delegate them to the
provider's nameservers, and need to manage records (A, MX, TXT, CNAME)
and VM auto-registration for them, without access to the PowerDNS API key.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
- Add
account+domainid(andprojectid) toaddDnsServerand
createDnsZone, consistent with other CloudStack resource APIs, so root
can provision a server entry or zone owned by a tenant. - Alternatively, an API to change zone ownership
(e.g.assignDnsZone/updateDnsZone account=... domainid=...). - Allow domain admins to call
addDnsServeras documented, or update the
docs if root-only is intended. - Allow multiple allowed suffixes per public server, or per-domain suffix
rules (e.g. domainROOT/CustomerAmay createcustomer.com). - Optional: an ownership verification step (TXT challenge) before a tenant
can create a zone outside the public suffix, to prevent zone squatting.
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
- As root admin, add a public PowerDNS server with
publicdomainsuffix=cloud.provider.example. - As a tenant user, try to create zone
customer.com-> forced under the suffix. - As a tenant user or domain admin, try
addDnsServer-> "can only be called by root admin". - As root, try
addDnsServeragain with the same URL -> "already has a DNS server integration for URL". - As root, create zone
customer.com-> owned by root, not visible to the tenant.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Java
- Estrellas
- 3.1k
- Forks
- 1.4k
- Merge medio
- 7 d 16 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 15
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de apache/cloudstack
-
resizeVolume of a running system VM's volume is accepted but the VM never sees the new sizePosiblemente ocupada @bhouse-nexthop la tomó hace 4 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
apache/cloudstack#14645 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
VR reports a load balancer change as applied when haproxy.cfg cannot be replacedPosiblemente ocupada @bhouse-nexthop la tomó hace 4 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
apache/cloudstack#14633 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
restartNetwork reports a ResourceUnavailableException as an unexpected error (530), unlike restartVPC (534)Posiblemente ocupada @bhouse-nexthop la tomó hace 4 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
apache/cloudstack#14631 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
apache/cloudstack#14625 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Remote access VPN users are disconnected on every LB, ACL, port forward or firewall change (xl2tpd restarted on every iptables pass)Posiblemente ocupada @willbennett-devops la tomó hace 12 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
apache/cloudstack#14545 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de apache/cloudstack
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
ls1intum/thesis-management#1473 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
LunaDeerMC/Dominion#301 · 1 comentario ·
-
[FEATURE] Expose external refresh, node-level translog and warmer statsPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abiertountriaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
opensearch-project/opensearch-prometheus-exporter#680 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días