VM snapshot usage records are attributed to the wrong snapshot; older snapshots stop accruing usage entirely

Comienza localizando VMSnapshotUsageParser e inspecciona la construcción de claves alrededor de la línea 68 y createUsageRecord alrededor de la línea 88. Reproduce el caso de dos snapshots y consulta los registros de uso descritos en el issue. Se considera completado cuando los intervalos de cada snapshot llevan su propio ID y los snapshots más antiguos siguen acumulando uso sin ser expulsados.

problem

When a VM has more than one VM snapshot, VMSnapshotUsageParser mis-attributes usage and silently drops usage for all but the newest snapshot. Two distinct defects combine:

1. The usage interval is labelled with the wrong snapshot ID. Duration, size and disk offering are taken from the previous event, but the snapshot ID is taken from the current one (line 88):

createUsageRecord(UsageTypes.VM_SNAPSHOT, duration, previousCreated, createDate, account, volId, zoneId,
previousEvent.getDiskOfferingId(), vmId,
previousEvent.getSize(), // previous snapshot
usageRec.getVmSnapshotId()); // current snapshot ← wrong label

2. Concurrent snapshots of the same volume overwrite each other. unprocessedUsage is keyed on VM + volume only (line 68), so a newer event evicts the older one and the older snapshot never reaches the closing loop:

String key = vmId + ":" + volId;
...
unprocessedUsage.put(key, usageRec); // line 96 — evicts the previous snapshot

Net effect: the first snapshot's usage is credited to the second snapshot, and the first snapshot stops accruing usage even though it still exists and is Ready.

Observed in a lab with two snapshots on one VM, neither deleted (both Ready, removed IS NULL):

DB entries from repro environment confirming the above

mysql> select * from cloud.vm_snapshots where removed is null;
+----+--------------------------------------+------------------------------+--------------+-------------+-------+------------+-----------+---------------------+------------------+-------+--------+---------+--------------+---------------------+---------------------+---------+
| id | uuid | name | display_name | description | vm_id | account_id | domain_id | service_offering_id | vm_snapshot_type | state | parent | current | update_count | updated | created | removed |
+----+--------------------------------------+------------------------------+--------------+-------------+-------+------------+-----------+---------------------+------------------+-------+--------+---------+--------------+---------------------+---------------------+---------+
| 4 | 09bd5ac1-6a90-487f-afed-0798d5440107 | i-2-193-VM_VS_20260818150857 | Testsnap1 | Testsnap1 | 193 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Disk | Ready | NULL | 0 | 2 | 2026-08-18 15:08:59 | 2026-08-18 15:08:57 | NULL |
| 5 | 71bcbec9-0760-4b34-8551-9fcc5a891027 | i-2-193-VM_VS_20260818154342 | Testsnap2 | Testsnap2 | 193 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Disk | Ready | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2026-08-18 15:43:45 | 2026-08-18 15:43:42 | NULL |
+----+--------------------------------------+------------------------------+--------------+-------------+-------+------------+-----------+---------------------+------------------+-------+--------+---------+--------------+---------------------+---------------------+---------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> select * from cloud_usage where usage_type=25 and usage_id=5;
+---------+---------+------------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------------+------------+--------------------+----------------+---------+-------------+-------------+----------+------+------------+------------+---------------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------+-----------+--------+------------------+-----------+-------+
| id | zone_id | account_id | domain_id | description | usage_display | usage_type | raw_usage | vm_instance_id | vm_name | offering_id | template_id | usage_id | type | size | network_id | start_date | end_date | virtual_size | cpu_speed | cpu_cores | memory | quota_calculated | is_hidden | state |
+---------+---------+------------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------------+------------+--------------------+----------------+---------+-------------+-------------+----------+------+------------+------------+---------------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------+-----------+--------+------------------+-----------+-------+
| 1803640 | 1 | 2 | 1 | VMSnapshot Id: 5 Usage: VM Id: 193 Volume Id: 223 Size: (8.00 GB) 8589934592 | 0.579445 Hrs | 25 | 0.5794447064399719 | 193 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 5 | NULL | 8589934592 | NULL | 2026-08-18 15:08:59 | 2026-08-18 15:43:45 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | 0 | NULL |
| 1803641 | 1 | 2 | 1 | VMSnapshot Id: 5 Usage: VM Id: 193 Volume Id: 223 Size: (8.00 GB) 8589934592 | 8.270833 Hrs | 25 | 8.270833015441895 | 193 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 5 | NULL | 8589934592 | NULL | 2026-08-18 15:43:45 | 2026-08-18 23:59:59 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | 0 | NULL |
+---------+---------+------------+-----------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------------+------------+--------------------+----------------+---------+-------------+-------------+----------+------+------------+------------+---------------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------+-----------+--------+------------------+-----------+-------+
2 rows in set (2.45 sec)

Record 1803640 spans Testsnap1's creation to Testsnap2's creation, Testsnap1's usage interval , but carries usage_id = 5. Testsnap1 (id 4) has no usage records at all.

Below is the list of Usage expected vs Actual

Testsnap1 (15:08:59 (created time) --> 23:59:59) - Expected Usage: 8.85 hrs, Actual Usage: 0
Testsnap2 (15:43:45 (created time) --> 23:49:59) - Expected Usage: 8.27 Hrs, Actual Usage: 8.85 Hrs

Note: The visible symptom depends on aggregation timing. If both snapshots are created within one aggregation window, the first snapshot gets no records at all. If the second is created in a later window, the first gets records only up to the last completed bucket, and the interval between that boundary and the second snapshot's creation is credited to the second snapshot.

Snapshot chaining makes this the normal case rather than an edge case, note parent = 4 on Testsnap2.

versions

Cloudstack Version: 4.22/4.22.1
Hypervisor: KVM
Primary Storage: NFS
Database: MySQL 8.4

Usage Settings:

+-----------------------------------+-------+
| name | value |
+-----------------------------------+-------+
| usage.aggregation.timezone | GMT |
| usage.execution.timezone | GMT |
| usage.sanity.check.interval | NULL |
| usage.snapshot.virtualsize.select | false |
| usage.stats.job.aggregation.range | 1440 |
| usage.stats.job.exec.time | 00:15 |
+-----------------------------------+-------+

The steps to reproduce the bug

1. Deploy an instance on any hypervisor supporting VM snapshots.
2. Take a VM snapshot (Testsnap1).
3. Take a second VM snapshot on the same instance (Testsnap2). Do not delete either.
4. Wait for the usage aggregation job to run.
5. Query the usage records:

SELECT usage_id, description, usage_display, start_date, end_date
FROM cloud_usage.cloud_usage
WHERE usage_type = 25 ORDER BY start_date;

SELECT id, vm_id, volume_id, vm_snapshot_id, size, created, processed
FROM cloud_usage.usage_vmsnapshot WHERE vm_id = ;

What to do about it?

Two changes in VMSnapshotUsageParser:

1. Line 88 — label the record with the snapshot the interval belongs to:

previousEvent.getSize(), previousEvent.getVmSnapshotId());

2. Line 68 — include the snapshot ID in the key so concurrent snapshots of one volume don't evict each other:

String key = vmId + ":" + volId + ":" + usageRec.getVmSnapshotId();

Note the snapshot ID is already populated correctly on insert. createUsageVMSnapshot() reads it from usage_event_details and calls vsVO.setVmSnapshotId(...), so the data needed for both fixes is present; it's only ignored by the parser.