feat(aidd-orchestrator): react to failing CI checks and quality-gate feedback
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 65/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- ci-cd
Línea de trabajo
Start in plugins/aidd-orchestrator/skills/00-async-dev/actions/review/, especially 01-collect-comments and 03-fix-iteration, and trace how review signals reach the fix loop. Check the existing gh pr checks interaction and comment filtering, then verify that failing checks and quality-gate findings trigger iterations while genuine bot noise remains filtered. Done means the orchestrator cannot finalize a PR with red checks.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Problem
aidd-orchestrator reviews a pull request by reading human comments, and only human comments. Its loop lives in plugins/aidd-orchestrator/skills/00-async-dev/actions/review/ (01-collect-comments, 03-fix-iteration).
Two signals are ignored:
- CI status. A red check does not trigger anything. The orchestrator will happily finalize a PR whose build is broken.
- Quality-gate feedback. Sonar comments are filtered out as bot noise, so its findings never reach the fix loop.
Scope
- Read
gh pr checksand detect failing checks. - Stop discarding quality-gate comments as bot output; route them into the fix loop.
- Iterate a fix on either signal, the same way a human comment does today.
Acceptance criteria
- A failing CI check triggers a fix iteration.
- A quality-gate finding triggers a fix iteration.
- The orchestrator never finalizes a PR whose checks are red.
- Genuine bot noise is still filtered; only quality-gate output gets through.
Origin
Backlog audit 2026-05-21 (aidd_docs/tasks/2026_05/2026_05_21-backlog-audit-and-roadmap.md). Replaces the old #80.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 481
- Forks
- 45
- Merge medio
- 19 h 38 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 108
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de ai-driven-dev/framework
-
refactor(aidd-orchestrator): the check zone says when to stop, and reviews its axes in one round Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
ai-driven-dev/framework#887 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
ai-driven-dev/framework#873 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
ai-driven-dev/framework#872 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
ai-driven-dev/framework#625 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
ai-driven-dev/framework#467 · 1 comentario ·
Todos los issues de ai-driven-dev/framework
Issues similares
-
VerificationGate: ATTRIBUTION quote guard never matches a normal quotation (\b around the quote) Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
danielmiessler/LifeOS#2234 ·
-
T: Bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100