Run Service renewal throws NullReferenceException after a post-success failure and abandons the active job
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 78/100
Línea de trabajo
Comienza en src/Runner.Listener/JobDispatcher.cs, en la sobrecarga de Run Service RenewJobRequestAsync, y después lee las pruebas de renovación en src/Test/L0/Listener/JobDispatcherL0.cs, especialmente el caso existente de excepción terminal. Reproduce la secuencia de renovación exitosa seguida de una excepción genérica y añade cobertura de regresión que demuestre que se usa la ventana de lease más reciente y que el worker no se abandona mientras los reintentos sigan siendo válidos.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Describe the bug
For Run Service jobs, if lease renewal succeeds at least once and a later renewal throws a non-terminal exception, the renewal task can fail with NullReferenceException. The active worker is then cancelled and the job is reported as Abandoned, even though the most recently acquired lease is still valid.
In the Run Service overload of RenewJobRequestAsync, request is initialized to null and never assigned:
TaskAgentJobRequest request = null;
var renewResponse = await runServer.RenewJobAsync(planId, jobId, token);
After the first successful renewal, the exception path reads:
remainingTime = request.LockedUntil.Value + TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5) - DateTime.UtcNow;
The successful response is stored in renewResponse, but the retry path reads request.LockedUntil. Therefore, a generic renewal exception after the first success causes a NullReferenceException.
Relevant source:
- https://github.com/actions/runner/blob/v2.336.0/src/Runner.Listener/JobDispatcher.cs#L748-L850
- https://github.com/actions/runner/blob/main/src/Runner.Listener/JobDispatcher.cs#L748-L850
The same implementation is present in v2.336.0 and in main as of 2026-08-14.
To Reproduce
This can be reproduced at unit level:
- Configure
IRunServer.RenewJobAsyncto return a successfulRenewJobResponsewith a futureLockedUntil. - Allow the next renewal cycle to start.
- Configure the next call to throw
HttpRequestExceptionor another generic exception. - Observe that
RenewJobRequestAsyncthrowsNullReferenceExceptioninstead of entering the lease-window retry path. - The completed/faulted renewal task causes
RunAsyncto cancel the worker and report the job asAbandoned.
Expected behavior
After a successful renewal, a later retriable exception should use the most recent LockedUntil value and continue retrying within the existing lease window, including the configured five-minute buffer. The active worker should not be cancelled while that retry window remains valid.
Runner Version and Platform
- Runner version:
2.336.0 - Platform: Linux x64
- Environment: self-hosted runner in a Kubernetes Pod
What's not working?
The issue was observed twice on the same runner during a period of TLS/network instability.
First occurrence:
[2026-08-14 05:23:22Z] Successfully renew job <job-id>,
job is valid till 08/14/2026 05:33:22
[2026-08-14 05:26:45Z] Back off ... before next retry. 1 attempt left.
[2026-08-14 05:26:55Z] Catch exception during renew runner job <job-id>.
System.Net.Http.HttpRequestException: The SSL connection could not be established.
System.IO.IOException: Received an unexpected EOF or 0 bytes from the transport stream.
[2026-08-14 05:26:55Z] Send job cancellation message to worker for job <job-id>.
[2026-08-14 05:29:31Z] Job completed with result: Abandoned
[2026-08-14 05:29:37Z] System.NullReferenceException:
Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
at GitHub.Runner.Listener.JobDispatcher.RenewJobRequestAsync(IRunServer runServer, ...)
The RunServer request layer made five total attempts—one initial attempt and four retries—before the exception reached JobDispatcher.
A second job showed the same sequence:
05:51:45 Last successful renewal; valid until 06:01:45
05:55:27 Renewal exception and immediate worker cancellation
06:00:26 Job reported as Abandoned
06:08:48 NullReferenceException surfaced
The delayed NullReferenceException is surfaced when the already-faulted renewal task is later awaited; worker cancellation begins as soon as that task becomes completed.
Job Log Output
The active workflow step was cancelled without a workflow cancellation request.
Runner and Worker's Diagnostic Logs
The worker received the cancellation at the same time as the renewal failure:
[2026-08-14 05:26:55Z] Cancellation/Shutdown message received.
[2026-08-14 05:26:55Z] Cancel current running step.
[2026-08-14 05:26:55Z] Sending SIGINT to process <pid>.
[2026-08-14 05:27:03Z] Sending SIGTERM to process <pid>.
[2026-08-14 05:27:05Z] Kill entire process tree since both cancel and terminate signal have been ignored.
Full diagnostic logs contain environment-specific information and can be provided privately if needed.
Possible fix direction
One option would be to retain the most recent renewResponse.LockedUntil value and use it in the exception path instead of reading the unassigned request.
A regression test could cover the Run Service sequence:
successful renewal -> generic exception -> retry/recovery
The existing Run Service test covers the terminal TaskOrchestrationJobNotFoundException case, but not a generic exception after a successful renewal:
https://github.com/actions/runner/blob/main/src/Test/L0/Listener/JobDispatcherL0.cs#L219-L285
The affected Run Service renewal overload was introduced in https://github.com/actions/runner/pull/2461.
- Lenguaje dominante
- C#
- Estrellas
- 6.3k
- Forks
- 1.4k
- Merge medio
- 2 d 9 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 26
Preparar el entorno
Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de actions/runner
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
actions/runner#4600 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de actions/runner
Issues similares
-
ci-failure-cause test-failure
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
area:frontend bug FE hotspot:css mvp P3
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
klasolsson81/jobbliggaren#1856 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Area: App+Library Build
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Aaronontheweb/freshdesk-cli#148 ·