Variable Name Conflicts
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- backend-api-design
Línea de trabajo
Read the linked context in accordproject/web-components#197 and trace how TemplateMark variables are expanded into CiceroMark, especially the repeated partyId fields for licensee and licensor. The issue proposes distinguishing the edited field name from the model variable name, but leaves the design unresolved. Done means updates to one party no longer change the other; the issue names no tests or source files.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Bug Report 🐛
In some cases, editing one variable within web-components will edit another variable making it impossible to distinguish them
Expected Behavior
Update to a variable should be propagated to the same variable in other places in the document, but not to different variables
Current Behavior
Example with the copyright license template:

Both licensor and licensee variables have type AccordParty which seems to confuse the algorithm responsible for propagating variable changes. TemplateMark holds on to the licensee and licensor variables, but those are expanded (since they are complex types) before generating the CiceroMark.
CiceroMark, TemplateMark, and Model
Model
asset CopyrightLicenseContract extends AccordContract {
/* the effective date */
o DateTime effectiveDate
/* licensee */
o AccordParty licensee
o String licenseeState
o String licenseeEntityType
o String licenseeAddress
/* licensor */
o AccordParty licensor
o String licensorState
o String licensorEntityType
o String licensorAddress
...
CiceroMark
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.ciceromark.Variable",
"value": ""Me"",
"name": "partyId",
"elementType": "String"
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.commonmark.Text",
"text": " ("Licensee"), a "
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.ciceromark.Variable",
"value": ""NY"",
"name": "licenseeState",
"elementType": "String"
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.commonmark.Text",
"text": " "
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.ciceromark.Variable",
"value": ""Company"",
"name": "licenseeEntityType",
"elementType": "String"
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.commonmark.Text",
"text": " with offices located at "
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.ciceromark.Variable",
"value": ""1 Broadway"",
"name": "licenseeAddress",
"elementType": "String"
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.commonmark.Text",
"text": ", and "
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.ciceromark.Variable",
"value": ""Myself"",
"name": "partyId",
"elementType": "String"
},
TemplateMark
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.templatemark.VariableDefinition",
"name": "licensee",
"elementType": "org.accordproject.cicero.contract.AccordParty"
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.commonmark.Text",
"text": " ("Licensee"), a "
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.templatemark.VariableDefinition",
"name": "licenseeState",
"elementType": "String"
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.commonmark.Text",
"text": " "
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.templatemark.VariableDefinition",
"name": "licenseeEntityType",
"elementType": "String"
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.commonmark.Text",
"text": " with offices located at "
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.templatemark.VariableDefinition",
"name": "licenseeAddress",
"elementType": "String"
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.commonmark.Text",
"text": ", and "
},
{
"$class": "org.accordproject.templatemark.VariableDefinition",
"name": "licensor",
"elementType": "org.accordproject.cicero.contract.AccordParty"
},
Possible Solution
We need to distinguish between the name of the field to be updated when editing, and the name of the variable in the model (field name in the owning type). For complex types, those are two different things.
Perhaps we should set elementType in the CiceroMark for this example to AccordParty and the name should be licensee -- it is then up to the editor/transformation to decide on the best way to edit or render the complex type (e.g. we could use a popup with Concerto form for some complex types). In the default case that means editing or rendering the identifier (String).
We will need to distinguish between --> AccordParty and AccordParty because we would use different editors for those.
However, the variable partyId is of type String. This could make pop ups difficult to handle.
Also, how would that work when a type has multiple variables (e.g., an Address)?
The bottom line is that you need more context (how did you get to that one variable).
Context
Please see https://github.com/accordproject/web-components/issues/197 for complete context
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 86
- Forks
- 69
- Merge medio
- 6 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 3
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de accordproject/markdown-transform
-
Stale
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
accordproject/markdown-transform#679 · 2 comentarios ·
-
@accordproject/markdown-it-template has a Nerq Trust Score of 68.0/100 — verified badge availableAbiertoStale
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 20/100
accordproject/markdown-transform#664 · 1 comentario ·
-
Stale
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
accordproject/markdown-transform#582 · 2 comentarios ·
-
Rename CiceroMark to AgreementMarkQuizá libre de nuevo @anablaz la tomó hace 980 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. AbiertoStale
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 20/100
accordproject/markdown-transform#536 · 4 comentarios ·
-
Help Wanted 🆘 maintainer-engaged Type: Discussion 🗣 Type: Feature Request 🛍️ Type: Need Investigation 🔬
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
accordproject/markdown-transform#368 · 7 comentarios ·
Todos los issues de accordproject/markdown-transform
Issues similares
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
fdm-monster/fdm-monster#5563 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
be-BOP-io-SA/be-BOP#2849 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 79/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
1️⃣ phase/under-investigation flaky/confirmed flaky/needs-decision type/bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
growilabs/growi#12246 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
🐛 The Rulekeeper - An index run that gives up on the lock ends SucceededPosiblemente ocupada @github-actions la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
SSWConsulting/SSW.Rules#2809 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día