Security Issue: Risk of Dependency Confusion with `scancode-workbench`
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 42/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- build-system, security
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con package.json y verifica cómo se denomina e incluye scancode-workbench; después, comprueba la URL vinculada del registro npm. Confirma con las personas mantenedoras si el paquete debe ser privado o si se debe reclamar su nombre; se considera terminado cuando se ha aplicado la protección elegida y el flujo de trabajo de gestión de paquetes ya no deja este nombre expuesto a dependency confusion.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Description
I have identified a potential security risk related to a Dependency Confusion vulnerability within our project. Our package.json refers to the package named scancode-workbench, which, according to our findings, does not exist on the public npm registry. This poses a risk that a malicious package could be uploaded to npm with the same name, leading our build systems to accidentally pull and use the malicious package instead of our intended local or private repository package.
Affected Package
Package Name: scancode-workbench
Current Usage: Referenced in package.json as the project name and included as a dependency.
Version: 4.0.3
Risk Impact
If an attacker were to upload a malicious package to npm under the scancode-workbench name with a higher version number, they could execute arbitrary code within our systems or steal sensitive data, depending on how the package is utilized within our projects.
Every single time anyone would use the command npm install pkg name, the malicious package would be fetched. Even in automated pipelines, the higher version number of the malicious package on the public registry would cause a public vs private dependency confusion and might make systems fetch the malicious version of our package.
Steps to Reproduce
- Check the npm registry for
scancode-workbench: [(https://registry.npmjs.org/scancode-workbench)] - Observe that the package does not exist on npm, presenting a risk for dependency confusion attacks.
Proposed Solutions
To mitigate this risk, we have a couple of options:
-
Claim the Package Name on npm: By claiming the package name on npm, we can prevent unauthorized parties from uploading a malicious package with the same name. This involves creating a minimal, benign package under the
scancode-workbenchname to reserve it. -
Mark the Package as Private: If the package is intended for internal use only and not meant to be published, we should specify this in our
package.jsonby adding"private": true. This ensures that npm will refuse to publish it, avoiding any accidental exposure.Example:
{ "name": "scancode-workbench", "version": "4.0.3", "private": true, "description": "An application for viewing ScanCode results and concluding component origin and license" }
Action Required
- Decide on claiming the package name or marking it as private.
- Implement the chosen solution to secure our package management workflow.
Additional Information
- Reviewing our internal dependency management policies to avoid similar issues in the future.
- Ensuring all developers are aware of the implications of public vs. private packages in npm.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 174
- Forks
- 81
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de aboutcode-org/scancode-workbench
-
reference scancode.io in README prominentlyQuizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
aboutcode-org/scancode-workbench#639 · 4 comentarios ·
-
Support scancode-toolkit v32.3.0 output format changesPosiblemente ocupada @prakhardixit9793 la tomó hace 5 días. Abiertogood first issue
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
aboutcode-org/scancode-workbench#634 · 3 comentarios ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
aboutcode-org/scancode-workbench#632 · 5 comentarios · 1 reacción ·
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
-
nice to have
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
aboutcode-org/scancode-workbench#608 · 1 comentario ·
Todos los issues de aboutcode-org/scancode-workbench
Issues similares
-
area: infrastructure bug priority: low
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
snapotter-hq/SnapOtter#4575 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation server-memory v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#5457 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
comp: ssr comp: zones type: feature version: current (v17+)
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
angular/angularfire#3836 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día