Questions / Feature Requests (maybe)... seeing what I can do with MWS compared with what i did with TWS
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 20/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- backend
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading the MultiWikiServer documentation and its existing wiki configuration and plugin handling entry points; the issue does not name files or tests. Compare the requested plugin stores, shared files, included wiki templates, and tag based organization with what the project supports. Done would require clarifying which capabilities are missing and defining their scope; this issue alone does not identify a specific change or completion test.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Question on MWS compared with what I was doing in TWS
a lot of this is wrapped in rpg management because that is what I was using it for, could apply to uses in a lot of wikis types
i could have made the questions more generic but I used what I know
Trying to figure out if MWS would work with my projects workflow.
Basically is this possible? Is this something that would work now or will come later?
PluginStore...
In TiddlyServer I had a folder "MyPluginStore"
I did "twplugins='./wikis/MyPluginStore'" in my "start.sh" file.
All I had to do was put the plugin in the "MyPluginStore" folder under the correct name space.
Then in the Wiki's "tiddlywiki.info" I wanted to use that plugin I just included the correct name space under plugins.
MyPlugins...
In TiddlyServer I had a folder MyCustomPlugins.
I had one wiki for each plugin or plugin family with documentation and tests.
I then did "twplugins+=':./wikis/MyCustomPlugins/FieldRunnerPlugin/plugins'" in my "start.sh" for each custom plugin that I would require.
Then in the Wiki's "tiddlywiki.info" I wanted to use that plugin I just included the correct name space under plugins.
Unattached shared .tid and .json...
In TiddlyServer I used "FileSystemPaths" to direct the output of certain tagged tiddlers into a common shared folder in my wikis folder.
Mostly just .json tiddlers.
Before I figured out how to use the FileSystemPaths I moved them by hand.
Another reason for moving them by hand was I created a lot, A LOT, of them before understanding shares as well.
WikiTemplate...
My own designation for a Wiki that had the default look and feel I wanted along with some common css, and by default the settings I had made on that wiki.
All my later wikis pulled this wiki in first using "includeWikis". Any time I wanted to make a change I changed the WikiTemplate and refreshed the server, changes would then be reflected on the wikis unless of course I messed up and had changed something on the target wikis... that was fun figuring out at times where I had overrrided the included wiki.
I had even created a bit of a hierarchy (a inheritance of included wikis)...
with a BaseTemplate wiki
A CampaignTemplate that pulled in "includeWikis" the BaseTemplate than had things custom to displaying campaigns
A ManualTemplate that pulled in "includeWikis" the BaseTemplate and again was customized for diplaying manuals.
Then My wikis would load "includeWikis" one of the three templates.
Organizing tiddlers...
Guessing this one would be a given for being able to pull just specific tagged tiddlers from other wikis but asking to clarify.
I used "FileSystemPaths" to organize tiddlers in wikis under folders and subfolders based on tags.
I mean the tags were already there and used for sorting and such why not use them to organize the folder structure.
End result I could use the "shared" folder and the "tiddlywiki.files" using "directories" to point to all the "monster folder" or the subfolder "undead" or to the sub-subfolder "skeleton", as an example. I could cast a wide net or be specific on what was available in the wiki accessing the shares.
This worked well for dealing with NPC wikis, especially with versions of NPC's where the NPC grows over a campaign. Then monsters, items, etc. etc.
Ultimately when I needed a module wiki for a game I would save out a standalone wiki and everything was wrapped up in a neat ready to use stand alone wiki. I think the worst case scenario I ran into was I had to drag drop some plugins into the stand alone wiki, I may have fixed that though because I do not remember it being a problem later on.
Thanks, frakier
And sorry to be a pain.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 60
- Forks
- 17
- Merge medio
- 4 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 1
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de TiddlyWiki/MultiWikiServer
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 57/100
TiddlyWiki/MultiWikiServer#145 · 8 comentarios ·
-
ci.yml fails on pushAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
TiddlyWiki/MultiWikiServer#144 ·
-
rpm v12 and allowScripts problemAbierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 15/100
TiddlyWiki/MultiWikiServer#141 · 2 comentarios ·
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
TiddlyWiki/MultiWikiServer#140 · 4 comentarios ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
TiddlyWiki/MultiWikiServer#139 ·
Todos los issues de TiddlyWiki/MultiWikiServer
Issues similares
-
[Bug]: Pen taps on sidebar rows start a drag and lose their clickPosiblemente ocupada @makhnatkin la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
b310-digital/teammapper#1515 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 79/100
puckeditor/puck#1884 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
outline/outline#14378 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
nicobailon/pi-web-access#642 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día