Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Explicit gcTime schedules a GC timer during SSR, retaining the whole render in memory

Abierto
#12,025 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

@AdzerKI ya está trabajando en esto.

Desde el 14/10/2026.

  • #12026 de @AdzerKI — abierto
  • #12053 de @mgarcialeniolabs — abierto

Evaluación

Dificultad
2/5
Tiempo estimado
1-3 horas
Aptitud para principiantes
25/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bien especificado
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
node.js, react, typescript
Área
frontend

Línea de trabajo

The bug is that an explicit finite gcTime schedules a real timer on the server, while the server default of Infinity does not. Start with the gist's gc-timer-retains-async-context.mjs reproduction and compare pending timers with default and finite. Pull request #12026 already targets this, so review it rather than starting a parallel fix. Done means no garbage-collection timer is scheduled on the server for any gcTime value.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Describe the bug

On the server, a query with an explicit finite gcTime (a regular client-side option) schedules a real setTimeout during SSR. The server default of Infinity is meant to prevent this, but an explicit gcTime bypasses it.

In Node, a pending timer keeps the render's async context (AsyncLocalStorage) alive until it fires. As a result, the entire render stays in memory: the HTML, the RSC payload, and the Request held by react-dom/server.

The timer serves no purpose. The request's QueryClient is discarded together with the response, so there is nothing left to garbage-collect.

Our case: Next.js 16, with a single useQuery({ gcTime: 24h }) in the root provider. Every render left behind a 24-hour timer and about 1.4 MB of retained memory. A heap snapshot of an idle replica showed 272 Request objects and 268 pending timers. Replicas grew until they hit the memory limit and were OOM-killed.

Your minimal, reproducible example

https://gist.github.com/AdzerKI/44081bf1d74a64d43ce651018ce2cba9

Steps to reproduce
  1. Save gc-timer-retains-async-context.mjs from the gist
  2. npm i @tanstack/query-core
  3. node --expose-gc gc-timer-retains-async-context.mjs default
  4. node --expose-gc gc-timer-retains-async-context.mjs finite
  5. Compare pendingTimers and rss in the output
Expected behavior

On the server, no garbage-collection timer should be scheduled for any gcTime value, the same as with the server default.

How often does this bug happen?

Every time

Screenshots or Videos

No response

Platform

OS: Linux
Runtime: Node.js 24.21.0 (server-side rendering, no browser involved)

Tanstack Query adapter

react-query

TanStack Query version

v5.104.2

TypeScript version

No response

Additional context

gcTime=default renders=2000 pendingTimers=0 external=2MB rss=119MB
gcTime=60000 renders=2000 pendingTimers=2000 external=1002MB rss=1069MB

Lenguaje dominante
TypeScript
Estrellas
50.4k
Forks
4.3k
Merge medio
13 h 35 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
442

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de TanStack/query

Todos los issues de TanStack/query

Issues similares

Más issues de TypeScript

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.