Vendored and hosted NuGet ignore a per-project packages.<project>.lock.json, so the lock is never re-pinned and every later restore fails NU1403 while VEX attests the patch
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 76/100
Línea de trabajo
Start with crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/nuget_feed.rs and crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/mod.rs, where the hard-coded lock filename is used, then review crates/socket-patch-core/src/vex/discover/nuget.rs. Use the repro based on crates/socket-patch-cli/tests/e2e_nuget_dotnet_build.rs and verify vendored and hosted scans recognize packages..lock.json, repin its contentHash, and leave locked and plain dotnet restore succeeding.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
[agent] Found by the scheduled NuGet / dotnet bug-hunt routine (ledger #320).
Summary
NuGet supports a per-project lock name: when packages.<ProjectName>.lock.json exists beside the project, NuGet reads and writes that file and does not use packages.lock.json (the convention for several projects in one directory, documented in the NuGet docs under "Locking dependencies"). socket-patch only looks for the hard-coded packages.lock.json:
- Vendored (
scan --mode vendored): it reportsvendor_nuget_no_lockfilewith the message "no packages.lock.json (RestorePackagesWithLockFile is off)". That is false, because the project does have a lock. It wires the folder feed and mapping but leavespackages.app.lock.jsonpinned to the upstreamcontentHash. Exit code is 0, and the in-run VEX attestsnot_affected (vendored). - Hosted (
scan --mode hosted): it adds the Socket source and the exact-id mapping, reportsredirected: 1with no warning, and leaves the named lock pinned to upstream. Exit code is 0, and the in-run VEX attestsnot_affected (redirected).
On the next restore, the patched nupkg doesn't match the lock. Every restore of the committed files then fails with NU1403: Package content hash validation failed for Newtonsoft.Json.13.0.3, both --locked-mode and plain dotnet restore.
Impact
Running vendored or hosted mode on such a project breaks its build in CI, and a fresh clone can't restore. The CLI reports success. The vendored warning tells the user the project has no lock, which points them the wrong way. VEX attests a patch the project can't install.
Repro (Linux, .NET SDK 8.0.131)
The repro is a scratch copy of crates/socket-patch-cli/tests/e2e_nuget_dotnet_build.rs, with the same wiremock Backend stand-in for the patch API and the hosted feed, and a real nuget.org fixture restore. The only change is that the fixture's lock is renamed:
# app.csproj: net8.0, RestorePackagesWithLockFile=true, PackageReference Newtonsoft.Json 13.0.3
dotnet restore # writes packages.lock.json
mv packages.lock.json packages.app.lock.json
rm -rf obj && dotnet restore --locked-mode # OK, and no packages.lock.json is created: NuGet uses the named lock
# sanity: corrupting a contentHash in packages.app.lock.json makes this restore fail NU1403,
# which proves NuGet really reads the named file
socket-patch scan --mode vendored --vendor-source service --json --yes --vex scan.vex.json ...
# rc 0; vendor result errorCode "vendor_nuget_no_lockfile":
# "no packages.lock.json (RestorePackagesWithLockFile is off); the vendored feed forces Newtonsoft.Json from the patched copy but its contentHash is not pinned"
# packages.app.lock.json unchanged; scan.vex.json: not_affected "Patched via Socket patch … (vendored)"
# fresh checkout (app.csproj, nuget.config, packages.app.lock.json, .socket/), cold NUGET_PACKAGES:
dotnet restore --locked-mode # rc 1: error NU1403: Package content hash validation failed for Newtonsoft.Json.13.0.3
dotnet restore # rc 1: same NU1403
The hosted run (scan --mode hosted --patch-server-url <stand-in>) behaves the same way: redirected: 1, warnings: [], the named lock is unchanged, the in-run VEX attests (redirected), and both restores fail NU1403.
Control: the same test with the default packages.lock.json passes. The lock is re-pinned, both restores exit 0, and the patched bytes are installed.
Each case reproduced 2/2 on main 61cfb9b.
Expected vs actual
- Expected: docs/ecosystems.md (NuGet row and "NuGet locked mode") says vendored and hosted mode pin the patched
.nupkgthrough the lock'scontentHash, so a locked restore installs the patched package. When there's no lock, vendored says so withvendor_nuget_no_lockfile. A lock that NuGet actually uses should be re-pinned. If socket-patch can't handle it, it should refuse loudly rather than report success. - Actual: the named lock is ignored. Vendored claims there's no lock, hosted says nothing, both exit 0, the build then fails NU1403, and VEX attests.
OS × version
| OS | SDK | vendored | hosted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | 8.0.131 | reproduces | reproduces |
| Linux | 8.0.131, default packages.lock.json (control) |
pass | pass |
| macOS / Windows, SDK 6/9/10 | untested (NuGet has supported the named-lock convention since 4.9, so it should be the same) |
Not bisected. The lock name is a constant in both writers.
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-core/src/vendor/nuget_feed.rs:33(const PACKAGES_LOCK: &str = "packages.lock.json"), used at:244to locate the lock and at:586for the misleadingvendor_nuget_no_lockfilemessage.crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/redirect/mod.rs:4413(rewrite_nugetreads onlyfiles.get("packages.lock.json")).crates/socket-patch-core/src/vex/discover/nuget.rsonly documents customNuGetLockFilePathnames as a VEX non-goal. Thepackages.<project>.lock.jsonconvention needs no property, and NuGet picks it up automatically.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 8
- Forks
- 0
- Merge medio
- 1 d 1 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 211
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de SocketDev/socket-patch
-
arch-audit refactor
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1011 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged arch-audit bug priority:p3
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#982 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Hosted yarn classic pins give no berry-migration warning, so a yarn 2+ install silently drops them (vendored warns about the same trap)Posiblemente ocupada @mikolalysenko la tomó hace 1 día. Abiertoagent:claimed agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-classic priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#907 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:bundler priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#896 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:yarn-berry priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#783 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de SocketDev/socket-patch
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 95/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Markdown Preview Fonts Don't Show Selected OptionPosiblemente ocupada @RadhiRasho la tomó hoy. Abiertostate:needs triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 61/100
zed-industries/zed#65300 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Add collect method to DataFrameAbiertoenhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día