Paths analytics query OOMs on multi-day windows for high-volume projects (uses 14-18 GiB of ClickHouse memory)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 42/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Stack tecnológico
- clickhouse, typescript
Línea de trabajo
Comienza por el punto de entrada de la consulta de analítica de Paths y del dashboard, y después revisa la documentación de self-hosting/ y las definiciones existentes de cohort_events_mv, dau_mv y event_property_values_mv. Reproduce la carga de trabajo de 8 días con mediciones del registro de consultas de ClickHouse; se considerará terminado cuando se haya seleccionado una mitigación que evite el fallo de memoria informado o comunique claramente los límites del rango seguro.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
The Paths analytics query (multi-CTE WITH session_paths AS (WITH paths_deduped_cte AS (WITH ordered_events AS ...)) aggregation) consumes 14–18 GiB of ClickHouse memory for an 8-day window on a project with ~1.5 billion screen_view events. With typical per-query memory limits, the query fails with Code 241 MEMORY_LIMIT_EXCEEDED and the dashboard surfaces it to users as Failed to execute 'json' on 'Response': Unexpected end of JSON input.
Setup
- Self-hosted OpenPanel via the
self-hosting/directory (runninglindesvard/openpanel-{api,dashboard,worker}:2) - ClickHouse
25.10.2.65 - ~1.46 billion total events; ~1.5 billion
screen_viewevents on the affected project - Resource limits in our deployment:
max_memory_usage = 16 GB(per query)max_server_memory_usage_to_ram_ratio = 0.85(24 GiB cgroup → 20.40 GiB server cap)max_concurrent_select_queries = 80
The query (captured from system.query_log exception_code = 241)
WITH session_paths AS (
WITH paths_deduped_cte AS (
WITH ordered_events AS (
SELECT session_id, concat(origin, path) as path, created_at
FROM events
WHERE project_id = '<redacted>'
AND name = 'screen_view'
AND path != '' AND path IS NOT NULL
AND created_at BETWEEN toDateTime('2026-05-25 00:00:00')
AND toDateTime('2026-06-02 00:00:00')
ORDER BY session_id ASC, created_at ASC
)
SELECT session_id,
arraySlice(
arrayFilter(
(x, i) -> i = 1 OR x != paths_raw[i - 1],
groupArray(path) AS paths_raw,
arrayEnumerate(paths_raw)
),
1, 5
) AS paths_deduped
FROM ordered_events
GROUP BY session_id
)
SELECT session_id, ..., paths[1] AS entry_page
FROM paths_deduped_cte HAVING length(paths) >= 2
)
SELECT entry_page, count() AS count
FROM session_paths
GROUP BY entry_page
ORDER BY count DESC LIMIT 3 FORMAT JSON
Observed memory usage
From system.query_log ExceptionWhileProcessing events on 2026-06-01 with our 16 GB per-query cap (= 14.90 GiB binary):
| event_time | mem_used | "would use" |
|---|---|---|
| 13:15:03 | 13.68 GiB | 17.46 GiB |
| 13:14:55 | 14.16 GiB | 16.47 GiB |
| 13:14:48 | 14.46 GiB | 18.46 GiB |
| 13:14:32 | 14.69 GiB | 18.47 GiB |
The query needs ~17–18 GiB to complete on an 8-day window for our event volume.
Why this is hard to mitigate from the operator side
The query uses groupArray(path) to materialize all events per session into an array, then arrayFilter to dedupe consecutive duplicates. Both operators hold the per-session aggregation state in memory. With ~300M screen_view events in an 8-day window distributed across many sessions, the per-thread aggregation state grows large.
arrayFilter and groupArray don't spill to disk via max_bytes_before_external_group_by — that setting only applies to direct GROUP BY materialization. So even with disk-spill enabled (we have it at 11 GB), this query stays entirely in RAM.
This means there's no purely operator-side fix; raising the per-query cap past ~20 GiB starts to risk OOM against the cgroup, and raising the cgroup means giving CH a larger share of host RAM at the expense of other containers.
Suggestions (in increasing order of effort)
- Document the memory cost in
self-hosting/docs. Operators of large self-hosted instances should know Paths analytics is memory-heavy. - UI date-range cap or warning on the Paths dashboard — suggest shorter ranges for high-volume projects, or warn before submitting if a heuristic projects high cost.
- Pre-aggregated session-paths materialized view at write time (similar to the existing
cohort_events_mv,dau_mv,event_property_values_mv). The dashboard could read a small summary rather than recomputing from raw events on every load. - Stream-aware rewrite — replace
groupArray(path)+arrayFilterwith a window function approach (CH 22+ has solid window function support) that can stream rather than buffer all paths per session.
Workaround we're using
- Raised
max_memory_usageto 16 GB so the median Paths query succeeds - Communicated to users that the Paths dashboard for high-volume projects should use 3–4 day ranges for now
Happy to provide additional data (full query text, EXPLAIN, system.query_log excerpts, EXPLAIN ESTIMATE) if useful.
Versions
lindesvard/openpanel-api:2,lindesvard/openpanel-dashboard:2,lindesvard/openpanel-worker:2(Docker Hub:2tag)- ClickHouse:
clickhouse/clickhouse-server:25.10.2.65 - Self-hosting layout: this repo's
self-hosting/
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 7.1k
- Forks
- 516
- Merge medio
- 1 d 16 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 10
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Sin guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Openpanel-dev/openpanel
-
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
Openpanel-dev/openpanel#551 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Self-hosted missing op1-replay.jsPosiblemente ocupada @houstona la tomó hace 19 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Openpanel-dev/openpanel#512 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
login page needs refinementPosiblemente ocupada @anandghegde la tomó hace 33 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Openpanel-dev/openpanel#495 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Session replay: early chunks saved under the wrong sessionPosiblemente ocupada @rjocoleman la tomó hace 9 días. Abierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
Openpanel-dev/openpanel#537 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 22/100
Openpanel-dev/openpanel#536 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de Openpanel-dev/openpanel
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
auth: agent-bearer --manager-call is told to use the MCP instance argument on an ambiguous managerAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 80/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Lyric and ApostrophesAbiertobug module: playback
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
chthollyphile/folia-major#739 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
agilepathway/label-checker#773 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día