Java client: no member enumeration, no GetElementProperties, no instance paths
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
@devin-ai-integration ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 7/11/2026.
- #2041 de @devin-ai-integration — abierto
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 42/100
Línea de trabajo
Start in client/java, especially internal/Protos.java and the Java Symbol, Model, and Instance APIs; compare the listed Python and Go methods and the protobuf fields and RPC messages. Implement member decoding, element-properties access, and instance-path access with the suggested fields and options. Done means Java callers can retrieve these data through public APIs, matching the documented behavior of the Python and Go clients.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
This issue was written with AI help. The results were produced against the version below.
The Java client (client/java) is the binding for JVM hosts: Eclipse-based tools, Cameo plugins, web services. Three features the service already serves, and the Python and Go clients expose, are missing from it:
| feature | service | Python | Go | Java |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SymbolInfo.members (#1974, capability symbol_members) |
yes | Symbol.members() |
Symbol.Members |
dropped: Symbol has no members |
GetElementProperties (#2013, capability element_properties) |
yes | Model.element_properties() |
Client.ElementProperties |
no method |
InstancePaths and Instance.reached_by (#1979) |
yes | Instance.paths(), .path, .owner |
Client.InstancePaths |
no method; Instance is id, type and feature values |
The data is already there: the generated protobuf classes contain SymbolInfo.members and the GetElementProperties messages, and Capabilities names SYMBOL_MEMBERS and ELEMENT_PROPERTIES. But internal/Protos.java never reads members, and no public method calls either RPC.
What it costs a Java user
We run the same 1630 static reads through every client, with the Pilot as oracle (https://github.com/hideo67/sysmlv2-tests, suite opensysml-java). Over sysml-grpc at 19bc16d1df:
| client | API | pass | fail | unsupported |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Python | Symbol API, with members() |
652 | 222 | 747 |
| Go | Symbol API, with Members |
642 | 232 | 747 |
| TypeScript | Symbol API, no members | 542 | 326 | 753 |
| Java | Symbol API, no members | 542 | 326 | 753 |
| Python, Go | element_properties |
1236 | 323 | 62 |
The Java client gives the same answer as the TypeScript client on every case. Where it gives the wrong answer, the decoding is not at fault; the information never reaches the caller:
- Inherited members are invisible. With
part def Base { part p; } part def Mid :> Base;andpart m : Mid;,m's inheritedpis not amongchildIds()orattributes(). 94 cases that Go passes fail in Java: inherited parts, ports, connections, parameters and annotations read through a usage or a specialization (our matrices A10, A30, A40, B12, B20, C01, C10, C30, D10). - No route to most of the metamodel. Through
element_properties, Python and Go answer 470 reads that the Symbol API has no field for (connector ends, send action arguments, value expressions, state entry/do/exit actions, documentation, ...). A Java user has no route to any of them. - No owner path of an object.
Instancedoes not say how it was reached, and there is no way to ask for its paths, so an object reached through a connector end cannot be traced back to its owner (6 more cases Go passes).
Suggestion
- Add
List<Member> members()toSymbol, read fromSymbolInfo.members, withinherited,inheritedFromandwithheldLibraryMembers, and an option forinclude_library_members, like Python'smembers(inherited=True, library=True). - Add
Model.elementProperties(String element, String... properties), returning element references with the id the call accepts back, like Python and Go. - Add
reachedBy,owner,pathtoInstanceandModel.instancePaths(Instance).
The TypeScript client also lacks members and instance paths (it has element_properties). A shared checklist of service features versus client bindings might help keep the bindings level.
Version
- OpenSysML
developat19bc16d1df(nightly-199-g19bc16d1df) - Java client 0.12.1 from
client/javaof the same commit (mvn -f client/java/pom.xml install), JDK 21;bin/sysml-grpcfrommake build-grpc - Suite: https://github.com/hideo67/sysmlv2-tests,
test-suite/test-opensysml-java
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 56
- Forks
- 17
- Merge medio
- 12 h 45 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 910
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Open-MBEE/OpenSysML
-
dependencies
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
Open-MBEE/OpenSysML#1951 · 3 comentarios · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
Open-MBEE/OpenSysML#2029 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement spec compliance
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
Open-MBEE/OpenSysML#2028 · 3 comentarios · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Symbol API fields answer differently from GetElementProperties, with no sign that the answer is incompletePosiblemente ocupada @devin-ai-integration la tomó hoy. Abiertodocumentation enhancement
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
Open-MBEE/OpenSysML#2021 · 2 comentarios · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de Open-MBEE/OpenSysML
Issues similares
-
area: metrics area: tracing contribfest enhancement good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation#4188 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
blinklabs-io/dingo#6074 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
kind/bug remote
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
podman-container-tools/podman#30143 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
component/mesheryctl kind/bug language/go
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
meshery/meshery#22993 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 64/100