Global `EnvFilter` prevents topic spans from being constructed at the default log level
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 68/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- rust
- Área
- observability
Línea de trabajo
Start in crates/tracing/src/init.rs, especially the subscriber construction around lines 90-93 and default_env_filter, then inspect crates/tracing/src/layers/metrics.rs and the existing tracing tests. Run the real pluto_tracing::init stack at the default info level and verify that topic labels are retained while console and Loki verbosity still follow --log-level. Add a regression test covering warn/error metrics and their topic labels.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
EnvFilter is attached as a global layer on the subscriber stack, so it gates Subscriber::enabled for every layer — including MetricsLayer: init.rs#L90-L93.
Every topic span in the workspace is DEBUG-level, and the default --log-level is info (common.rs#L103, default_env_filter). At info the span is never constructed, MetricsLayer::on_new_span never fires, no SpanTopic extension is stored, and event_topic walks an empty scope.
Result: 100% of warn/error events are counted under topic="" at the default configuration. The topic mechanism only works under RUST_LOG=debug.
Evidence
Probed against the real MetricsLayer, both directions:
| subscriber stack | console filter | debug_span! constructed |
app_log_warn_total label |
|---|---|---|---|
EnvFilter global (current) |
info |
no (is_disabled=true) |
topic="" |
EnvFilter global (current) |
debug |
yes | topic="<name>" |
EnvFilter on fmt only + MetricsLayer.with_filter(LevelFilter::DEBUG) |
info |
yes | topic="<name>" |
The third row is the proposed fix: the console still emits at info (the WARN printed normally), while the metric keeps its label.
Scope
This predates the topic work and is not caused by it. It already affects the two topics on main — health and stacksnipe — and will silently neutralise all 17 topics once #588 / #669 lands.
Why it matters
app_log_{warn,error}_total{topic}is the only per-component signal for warn/error rate. With one label value it answers no question that the unlabelled counter does not already answer — which is exactly what #588 set out to fix.- Generated alert rules are silently degraded.
define.rs#L375buildsincrease(app_log_warn_total{topic!~"vmock|tracker"}[30s]) > 2. Against a pluto node every series carriestopic="", which matches!~"vmock|tracker"— so the exclusion never excludes anything and the rule is strictly more trigger-happy than intended. This directly undercuts the re-validation planned in #583. - Grafana panels collapse.
dash_charon_overview.json#L1701-L1714aggregatesby (topic); pluto contributes a single empty series next to charon's ~20. - It blocks #47 (
app/tracer). The same global filter drops debug-level spans before they can reach an OTLP exporter, so an OTel integration inherits the problem rather than working around it.
Charon contrast
The counter is level-independent by construction: incWarnCounter(ctx) is the first statement of log.Warn, before the logger is consulted — log.go#L107-L108, same for log.Error. Charon's topic rides on context.Context, so console verbosity and metric labelling are independent concerns. Pluto couples them through the span, which is what makes the filter placement load-bearing.
Proposed fix
Move EnvFilter off the subscriber and onto the layers that should honour the operator's verbosity — fmt and Loki — and give MetricsLayer its own LevelFilter::DEBUG filter so topic spans are always materialised:
let registry = Registry::default()
.with(fmt_layer.with_filter(env_filter))
.with(MetricsLayer.with_filter(LevelFilter::DEBUG));
Loki needs the same treatment (it currently sits behind the global filter too), and EnvFilter is not Clone, so the filter has to be built per layer from the same directive string.
The alternative — promoting every topic span to info — is a smaller diff but makes span names visible in default console output and leaves the counter level-dependent, which is the coupling charon does not have.
Acceptance
-
app_log_{warn,error}_totalcarries itstopiclabel with the subscriber built bypluto_tracing::initat the defaultinfolevel. - A regression test in
crates/tracingpins this against the real layer stack, not a hand-built one. -
--log-levelstill controls console and Loki verbosity exactly as before.
Context
Diagnosed while reviewing #669; see this comment for the original analysis. Related: #588 (topic labels), #631 (span propagation), #583 (alert-rule re-validation), #47 (app/tracer).
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 8
- Forks
- 6
- Merge medio
- 4 d 3 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 18
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de NethermindEth/pluto
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 52/100
NethermindEth/pluto#719 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
enhancement rust
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
NethermindEth/pluto#640 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
rust
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
NethermindEth/pluto#638 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
enhancement rust
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
NethermindEth/pluto#635 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
Improve `alpha test peers`: match Charon's probes; reduce timeoutsPosiblemente ocupada @varex83agent la tomó hace 5 días. Abiertobug track:orchestration-cli
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 28/100
NethermindEth/pluto#632 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
Todos los issues de NethermindEth/pluto
Issues similares
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
wardian-app/Wardian#1603 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
bug
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
peteonrails/voxtype#844 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
feature
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
uwuclxdy/clauth#107 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días