Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

bug: Kubernetes bootstrap retry limits can leave sandboxes terminal during gateway startup

Abierto
#3,274 0 comentarios 1 reacción 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
kubernetes, rust

Línea de trabajo

Empieza por crates/openshell-sandbox/src/lib.rs, especialmente por la lógica grpc_retry de obtención de políticas y SIDECAR_READY_TIMEOUT_SECS; después inspecciona crates/openshell-driver-kubernetes/src/driver.rs y crates/openshell-server/src/compute/mod.rs. Construye la reproducción aislada de Kubernetes propuesta con disponibilidad retrasada del gateway y verifica las transiciones del ciclo de vida, la conservación del workspace, los reintentos acotados y cancelables, y una ruta de recuperación documentada sin volver a ejecutar workloads completados.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

state:triage-needed

User Story

As a Kubernetes operator, I want sandbox bootstrap to tolerate temporary gateway unavailability, so that dependency startup ordering does not require destructive recovery.

Problem Statement

This is a source-based report against public OpenShell v0.0.116 code. The deterministic reproduction below is proposed, not a claim of a completed isolated upstream test. No private deployment logs or configuration are included.

Three public implementation details appear to make delayed gateway startup a terminal sandbox failure:

  1. grpc_retry in the sandbox runtime makes five attempts, with 1/2/4/4-second waits. When initial policy fetching cannot connect, it returns an error after exhausting those attempts.
  2. The same file defines a separate SIDECAR_READY_TIMEOUT_SECS = 120 for the process supervisor waiting on the network supervisor. Extending the policy retry window alone would not remove this second deadline.
  3. The Kubernetes driver deliberately renders restartPolicy: Never, with a comment explaining that kubelet must not replace the canonical main-process generation after supervisor exit.

Consequently, a transient dependency outage before workload activation can exhaust bootstrap retries, terminate the pod, and leave no automatic retry when the gateway becomes available. The same retry limits remain in inspected main commit 02b664bb0d978ac0baec9aaa0bf06a2a4f67e83d.

Impact / Why This Matters

Kubernetes does not guarantee that the gateway is ready before sandbox pods start during cluster recovery. A short-lived startup outage should not require deleting a persistent sandbox.

The v0.0.116 gateway start handler rejects terminal Error phases; it allows Ready as an idempotent return and Stopped/Starting for start. This makes a documented, data-preserving recovery path important in addition to bootstrap retry behavior. Blanket automatic deletion/recreation would be inappropriate for persistent workspaces.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Before workload activation, a sandbox can tolerate transient gateway unavailability and become usable once the gateway returns without manual deletion.
  • A regression test delays gateway availability beyond both the current policy-fetch retry window and the 120-second process-sidecar wait.
  • No workload starts before authenticated policy and required enforcement bootstrap succeed. Permanent authentication/configuration/policy errors remain explicit failures, and TLS validation is preserved.
  • Individual attempts are bounded, retries use capped backoff, and waiting is cancellable and diagnosable.
  • Existing workspace data survives the tested recovery.
  • Explicit stops and completed workloads remain terminal; fixing bootstrap does not silently replay completed commands.
  • Document a supported, data-preserving recovery path for sandboxes already in terminal bootstrap error.

Reproduction Steps

Proposed deterministic test, not yet executed as an isolated upstream reproduction:

  1. Use a disposable Kubernetes deployment with the v0.0.116 gateway, supervisor, and sidecar topology.
  2. Create a persistent sandbox and write a workspace sentinel.
  3. Simulate dependency recovery so a replacement sandbox pod starts while its gateway callback is unavailable. Keep the gateway unavailable for more than 120 seconds.
  4. Restore gateway availability.
  5. Check pod/Sandbox/gateway state, whether a shell becomes usable without resource deletion, and whether the workspace sentinel is retained.

The public code predicts an exhausted Policy fetch retry followed by the separate sidecar-control-socket timeout. A regression test should establish the exact lifecycle transitions as well as successful recovery after the fix. Fault injection should use an isolated test deployment, not a shared production gateway.

Environment

Source versions and configuration relevant to the proposed test, not private deployment inventory:

  • OpenShell: public tag v0.0.116, latest published release at filing.
  • Additional source inspection: main commit 02b664bb0d978ac0baec9aaa0bf06a2a4f67e83d; no runtime test of that commit is claimed.
  • Compute driver: Kubernetes.
  • Supervisor topology: sidecar.
  • Persistent workspace; driver-generated restartPolicy: Never.

Related Work

#2179 and #2269 concern Docker/Podman Error-phase recovery. #2417 explicitly keeps Kubernetes lifecycle cluster-owned. They provide useful lifecycle context but do not appear to resolve the Kubernetes bootstrap retry limits above.

Changing pod restartPolicy globally to Always would alter the deliberately terminal main-process contract. This report requests bootstrap-specific resilience and a supported recovery path, not automatic replay or deletion of arbitrary failed workloads.

Lenguaje dominante
Rust
Estrellas
8.7k
Forks
1.3k
Merge medio
2 d 6 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
297

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de NVIDIA/OpenShell

Todos los issues de NVIDIA/OpenShell

Issues similares

Más issues de Rust

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.