Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Run, observe, and analyze Slurm benchmarks

Abierto
#877 1 comentario 0 reacciones 1 asignado Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

@andreatnvidia ya está trabajando en esto.

Desde el 24/8/2026.

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Descripción

task
Priority Level

High

Task Summary

Implement deterministic benchmark expansion, batch execution, fresh-process observation, and analysis for the optional Slurm integration.

Technical Details & Implementation Plan
  • Expand strict benchmark intent into deterministic child run configurations and immutable benchmark records.
  • Submit child runs through the public Slurm execution service and return without resident monitoring.
  • Persist benchmark-to-run identity so later processes can observe and analyze the same children.
  • Refresh child state through normalized scheduler and persisted-state evidence.
  • Compute stable aggregate analysis from validated child results while preserving failed, incomplete, and missing-run classifications.
  • Expose equivalent Python service and CLI operations for benchmark run and analyze workflows.
Acceptance criteria
  • Equivalent benchmark input expands to the same ordered child runs and digests.
  • Benchmark submission returns after scheduling children and does not require a resident controller.
  • Analysis works from a fresh process and never guesses success from incomplete evidence.
  • Missing, failed, partial, stale, and scheduler-inconsistent child runs remain explicit in results.
  • Local/fake tests cover expansion, submission, refresh, mixed outcomes, and deterministic analysis.
  • Real-cluster acceptance validates at least one multi-run benchmark workflow before release.
Out of scope
  • Interactive dashboards or resident monitoring.
  • New benchmark algorithms unrelated to Slurm execution.
  • Generic scheduler or platform adapters.
Investigation / Context

This is the benchmark implementation lane in #850. #865 and #872 explicitly exclude benchmark implementation, while #870 treats benchmark analysis as a final acceptance scenario.

Agent Plan / Findings

Reuse the same immutable planning, execution, and state contracts as ordinary runs; benchmark records should add hierarchy and analysis intent rather than a second control plane.

Dependencies

Depends on shared benchmark records in #873, fake infrastructure in #872, deterministic planning in #875, the client worker in #876, the public service foundation and operational run/observe capabilities from 874#1 and 874#2, the one-node runtime capability from 868#2, and the persistence, winner, observation, and reconciliation capabilities from 869#1, 869#2, and 869#3. It does not depend on distributed/failure hardening in 868#3, retry/collection in 869#4, or the later 874#3, 874#4, and 874#5 slices.

Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
2.3k
Forks
211
Merge medio
3 d 20 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
40

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner

Todos los issues de NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner

Issues similares

Más issues de Python

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.