Human-readable approval prompts + merge Kimi and Kimi Code into one app
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 18/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- accessibility, cli, design, desktop
Línea de trabajo
Start by locating the approval-dialog implementation and the separate Kimi and Kimi Code client entry points. Define the user-facing behavior and scope for both proposals before changing anything; done would require an agreed design, human-readable approval details, and a unified app experience.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
What feature would you like to see?
Hello!
I have two suggestions for improving Kimi Code.
- Approval prompts in human language, not terminal language.
Right now, approval dialogs show the user a raw command and nothing else. For a person without a technical background, this is a meaningless jumble of characters: it's impossible to tell what is being proposed, where the danger is, and what happens if you agree. As a result, users either click Approve blindly (which defeats the whole purpose of confirmation) or get stuck and have to ask someone for help.
AI coding agents are no longer used only by programmers — there's a huge army of vibe coders who solve their tasks through AI and don't read bash. For them, the current approval dialogs are a constant pain.
Proposal: by default, the approval card should contain a human-readable explanation, with the command hidden under a "Details" toggle:
What I want to do — one or two plain-language sentences ("I'll delete temporary files from the previous check and run the installer test").
Where the danger is — honest and specific ("Only temporary logs will be deleted, your files are untouched" or "This command changes system settings").
What I recommend — the agent's advice ("This is safe, go ahead" / "Better to decline, because...").
The technical command — collapsed by default, expandable on click for those who care.
This is a simple UI change that would make the product accessible to the mass user without taking anything away from professionals. - Merge Kimi and Kimi Code into a single desktop app.
Right now these are two separate products with two windows, two quotas, and constant confusion about where everything lives. The user shouldn't have to care whether something is "chat" or "code" — it's the same AI system, and it should be used in one place: chat, project files, agent tasks, subscription — all in one window. Two apps is unnecessary complexity for the user and, frankly, makes the product feel unfinished. Build one client with modes, not two clients with duplicated functionality.
Thank you!
Additional information
No response
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 7.7k
- Forks
- 1.3k
- Merge medio
- 12 h 35 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 311
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de MoonshotAI/kimi-code
-
手机竖屏显示状态下输入框的扩展按钮没有显示Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
MoonshotAI/kimi-code#4040 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
顶栏字体不随字体大小缩放bugAbiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
MoonshotAI/kimi-code#4039 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
MoonshotAI/kimi-code#4010 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
MoonshotAI/kimi-code#4008 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
docs(zh): configuration/providers.md is missing the "OAuth and credential injection" sectionAbierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
MoonshotAI/kimi-code#3947 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de MoonshotAI/kimi-code
Issues similares
-
refactor
Dificultad 2/5 Medio día Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 5 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
OHDSI/Data2Evidence#3450 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
e2e-failure ready-to-code
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
redhat-developer/rhdh-plugin-export-overlays#4011 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
automation missing-model model-sync provider:ofox
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
anomalyco/models.dev#8421 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
SlackAdapter and TelegramAdapter are not assignable to Adapter under exactOptionalPropertyTypesAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día