ltfs/mkltfs segfault when the drive INQUIRY vendor id is not IBM/HP/HPE/QUANTUM (NULL deref in _raw_open)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- c
- Área
- backend, operating-systems
Línea de trabajo
Start with get_supported_devs() in src/tape_drivers/vendor_compat.c and the device-opening loops in src/tape_drivers/linux/sg/sg_tape.c and src/tape_drivers/freebsd/cam/cam_tc.c; compare them with the guarded loop in src/tape_drivers/osx/iokit/iokit_tape.c. Reproduce with an mhvtl drive reporting an unknown vendor, then verify that opening it reports LTFS30213I and exits 1 without a segfault.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
What happens
Opening a tape drive whose INQUIRY vendor id is not one of IBM, HP, HPE
or QUANTUM crashes with SIGSEGV instead of being reported as an unsupported
drive.
# ltfs -o devname=/dev/sg9 /mnt/ltfs
...
LTFS17085I Plugin: Loading "sg" tape backend.
LTFS30209I Opening a device through sg-ibmtape driver (/dev/sg9).
# echo $?
139
139 is 128 + 11. The crash is immediately after INQUIRY and before any medium
command, so nothing touches the cartridge.
Why
get_supported_devs() in src/tape_drivers/vendor_compat.c:328 initialises
cur to NULL and its switch has no default, so an unknown vendor yields
NULL:
struct supported_device **get_supported_devs(int vendor)
{
struct supported_device **cur = NULL;
switch (vendor) {
case VENDOR_IBM: cur = ibm_supported_drives; break;
case VENDOR_HP: cur = hp_supported_drives; break;
case VENDOR_QUANTUM: cur = quantum_supported_drives; break;
}
return cur;
}
get_vendor_id() (same file, line 314) returns VENDOR_UNKNOWN for anything
else. _raw_open() in src/tape_drivers/linux/sg/sg_tape.c:502 then does:
struct supported_device **cur = get_supported_devs(priv->vendor);
while(*cur) { /* <- NULL */
The intended path is three lines below, and is never reached:
} else {
ltfsmsg(LTFS_INFO, 30213I, id_data.vendor_id, id_data.product_id);
close(priv->dev.fd);
priv->dev.fd = -1;
return -EDEV_DEVICE_UNSUPPORTABLE;
}
src/tape_drivers/freebsd/cam/cam_tc.c:284 has the same unguarded loop.
src/tape_drivers/osx/iokit/iokit_tape.c:861 already guards it with
while(cur && *cur), which is the fix.
Note: the device list does not warn you
ltfs -o device_list shows such a drive with a product name, because
sg_get_device_list() names it through _generate_product_name()
(sg_tape.c:4358), which matches on product id alone and only against the
IBM and HP tables. So a drive is listed as though it were known, and crashes
when opened:
Device Name = /dev/sg9 (16.0.19.0), Vendor ID = STK , Product ID = ULT3580-TD8 , Product Name =[ULT3580-TD8].
How to reproduce without the hardware
With mhvtl, which lets a virtual drive
present any identity. In /etc/mhvtl/device.conf:
Drive: 51 CHANNEL: 00 TARGET: 19 LUN: 00
Library ID: 50 Slot: 01
Vendor identification: STK
Product identification: ULT3580-TD8
Then ltfs -o devname=/dev/sgN /mnt/point on that drive's sg node.
This is not a contrived configuration. A StorageTek SL500 with LTO drives
is a real product: the library reports vendor STK while the drives inside it
carry IBM part numbers. So any tool that builds an STK-profile virtual library
with LTO drives produces this pairing by describing the hardware correctly. In
the management console I use, the STK profile offers
ULT3580-TD3 through ULT3580-TDA under drive_vendor: STK.
For what it is worth, most profiles are unaffected because they report IBM —
ADIC, DELL, Overland and Spectra libraries OEM IBM mechanisms and say so. Of
nine vendor profiles, seven produce a vendor id LTFS knows. STK is the one
that both reaches this code and appears in device_list, because its product
ids are in your IBM table even though its vendor id is not.
Still present in
main, release/v2.4.9.0 and release/v2.4.9.1 — all three are at efc9e3a
at the time of writing, and sg_tape.c:503, cam_tc.c:284 and
vendor_compat.c:328 are unchanged there.
Environment
- LTFS 2.4.9.0 (Prelim), LTFS Format Specification 2.4.0, built from
v2.4.9.0-10523 - Rocky Linux 9.8, kernel 5.14.0-687.47.1.el9_8.x86_64, gcc 11.5.0
sgbackend,./configure --disable-snmp- mhvtl 1.8
Fix
A pull request follows, against release/v2.4.9.1: while(cur && *cur) in the
sg and cam backends, matching what iokit already does. Verified on the
environment above — the same command now logs
LTFS30213I Unsupported Drive 'STK ' / 'ULT3580-TD8 '. and exits 1.
The FreeBSD half is the identical expression in the identical position but is
not compiled or tested here; happy to drop it if you would rather it went
separately.
- Lenguaje dominante
- C
- Estrellas
- 354
- Forks
- 111
- Merge medio
- 2 h 1 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 2
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de LinearTapeFileSystem/ltfs
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
LinearTapeFileSystem/ltfs#647 · 1 comentario ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
LinearTapeFileSystem/ltfs#645 · 3 comentarios ·
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
LinearTapeFileSystem/ltfs#643 ·
-
Format fails on HP LTO-6 6250 with Adaptec HBAQuizá libre de nuevo @madjesc la tomó hace 30 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. AbiertoH/W issue HBA Report Investigating
LinearTapeFileSystem/ltfs#640 · 8 comentarios · 1 asignado ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
LinearTapeFileSystem/ltfs#638 · 2 comentarios ·
Todos los issues de LinearTapeFileSystem/ltfs
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Failed to resolve logo sourceAbiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
fastfetch-cli/fastfetch#2628 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
FujiNetWIFI/fujinet-firmware#1736 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100