[CI failure] CI failure after TUnit 1.73.5 dependency update
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100
Línea de trabajo
Open run 37769545563 and inspect the earliest failed job and first meaningful error, especially the Ubuntu build-and-test job; the issue says the run logs were not available, so the failure is not yet confirmed. Check the workflow's .NET restore, build, and test path, and compare the TUnit 1.73.5 run with 1.72.16 if needed. Done means identifying and fixing the confirmed failure and passing the affected CI matrix.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
The post-merge CI run failed immediately after Dependabot updated TUnit and TUnit.AspNetCore from 1.72.16 to 1.73.5. The dependency bump is the only source change in the head commit, making the .NET build/test path the leading hypothesis, but the available GitHub read interface did not expose the run's job logs, so the exact failing job and first error still need confirmation.
Failure details
- Run: https://github.com/IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web/actions/runs/37769545563
- Commit:
49d1983b59f8822f538e2af8b1294cf69d674cd3 - Failed job and step: Not exposed by the available run-log interface; first check
Build, Test, and Deploy EssentialCSharp.Web's earliest failed job, especiallyBuild and test (Ubuntu)orBuild and test (<runner>). - Classification: Dependency or toolchain failure (provisional)
- Confidence: low pending the failed-step log
Evidence
The commit 49d1983b59f8822f538e2af8b1294cf69d674cd3 modifies only Directory.Packages.props, changing both package versions:
-<PackageVersion Include="TUnit" Version="1.72.16" />
-<PackageVersion Include="TUnit.AspNetCore" Version="1.72.16" />
+<PackageVersion Include="TUnit" Version="1.73.5" />
+<PackageVersion Include="TUnit.AspNetCore" Version="1.73.5" />
Those packages are referenced by EssentialCSharp.Chat.Tests/EssentialCSharp.Chat.Tests.csproj and EssentialCSharp.Web.Tests/EssentialCSharp.Web.Tests.csproj. The workflow runs restore, build, EF model-change validation, and tests on the .NET path. The TUnit release notes included in the commit mention runtime, globalization, and ASP.NET Core changes, so a compatibility or test-runner regression is plausible, but no specific test/error can be attributed without the run log. A local restore/build could not confirm it because this environment could not reach `(api.nuget.org/redacted)
Recommended actions
- Open run
37769545563and record the earliest failed job, step, and first meaningful error; distinguish restore/build/test failure from the independent frontend jobs. - Re-run the affected .NET command locally or in CI with the same SDK and
TUnitversions; compare against1.72.16if the failure is in compilation, test discovery, or execution. - If the failure reproduces only with
1.73.5, pin both packages back to1.72.16or apply the specific TUnit-compatible test change identified by the log, then rerun the full matrix.
Prevention
For Dependabot test-framework updates, require the CI run to pass across all runner matrices before merge and retain the first failing test/restore output in the failure report. A focused validation job for the two test projects would make future TUnit regressions distinguishable from frontend or runner failures.
Generated by CI Failure Doctor · copilot · gpt56 · 11.9 AIC · ⌖ 3.14 AIC · ⊞ 24K · ◷
Add this agentic workflow to your repo
To install this agentic workflow, run
gh aw add githubnext/agentics/workflows/ci-doctor.md@5d11aa2a05ce2c943c085acb7b12b583f83ed375
- Lenguaje dominante
- HTML
- Estrellas
- 8
- Forks
- 8
- Merge medio
- 1 d 31 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 87
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web
-
agentic-workflows
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web#1536 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agentic-workflows
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 38/100
IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web#1535 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agentic-workflows
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web#1534 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[aw] Detection RunsAbiertoagentic-workflows
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 5/100
IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web#1452 · 6 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
automation repo-assist
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 20/100
IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web#1447 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de IntelliTect/EssentialCSharp.Web
Issues similares
-
process
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
pyrite-wiki/pyrite#1036 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug dependencies github_actions
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
ChristianHandy/FleetPilot#233 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area/ci good first issue size/S type/bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
lorica-labs/volant#680 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
hyperledger-cello/cello#850 ·
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100