Rework dependency updates: Dependabot for CVEs, Renovate for everything else
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 49/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- github-actions, python, yaml
- Área
- build-system, ci-cd, devops
Línea de trabajo
Start with the listed files: template/pyproject.toml.jinja, pyproject.toml, renovate.json, template/renovate.json.jinja, periodic.yml, and the two dependency docs. Check the open questions about Renovate version and permissions, then trace how periodic.yml is rendered and how its test matrix runs. Done means the cooldown, Renovate settings, weekly unlocked job, failure issue handling, and docs match the proposal.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Rework dependency updates: Renovate only, no automerge, 3-day cooldown, weekly unlocked tests
Problem
- We use an uncomfortable mix of Renovate and Dependabot, with no clear split of responsibilities.
- Renovate's
lockFileMaintenanceautomerges, which people dislike, and it fills git history with lockfile commits. - Nothing tells us when an upstream release will break downstream users who install unlocked.
- There's no cooldown on new releases, which leaves us exposed to supply-chain attacks via freshly published packages.
- Until recently, Renovate only fixed CVEs in direct dependencies, so CVEs in transitive dependencies in
uv.locksat unfixed (see python-zocalo#319 for an example of the manual catch-up).
Goals
- CI runs against the lockfile, so upstream releases don't break unrelated PRs.
- A periodic unlocked run tells us what upstream changes would break downstream users.
- Nothing resolves releases newer than 3 days: not lock refreshes, not local upgrades, not unlocked runs.
- CVEs are patched as soon as the fix release is 3 days old, including in transitive dependencies. Urgent fixes can bypass the cooldown per package.
Proposal
| Area | Current | Proposed |
|---|---|---|
| CI | Runs locked (uv run --locked) |
Unchanged |
| Release cooldown | None | exclude-newer = "3 days" in pyproject.toml, matched by Renovate minimumReleaseAge: "3 days". Applies to every resolution: lock refreshes, local uv lock --upgrade, and the unlocked job |
| CVE alerts | Dependabot alerts (enabled in settings) | Unchanged. Used only as the alert source; no Dependabot PRs, no settings changes |
| CVE fixes | Renovate vulnerabilityAlerts (via config:recommended), direct dependencies only |
Unchanged config, and now covers transitive deps in uv.lock (Renovate ≥ 44.221.0, renovatebot/renovate#47482). Security PRs open immediately, ignoring schedule and grouping. If the fix is under 3 days old, the PR fails to lock until the window passes; for urgent cases, add exclude-newer-package to bypass |
| Lockfile refresh | Renovate lockFileMaintenance, automerged |
On demand only: a Dependency Dashboard checkbox, never automerged. Obeys the cooldown via pyproject.toml |
| Upstream breakage | Nothing | Weekly unlocked test job in periodic.yml; opens/updates an issue on failure |
| Actions / pre-commit bumps | Renovate, minor/patch grouped | Renovate, all grouped into a weekly PR, no automerge |
| Template-managed deps downstream | Ignored in template/renovate.json.jinja |
Unchanged |
| Copier updates | Renovate copier manager | Unchanged |
| Automerge | On for lock maintenance, via the renovate-approve app |
Off everywhere; renovate-approve no longer needed |
Renovate is the only bot. Dependabot is used only as the source of alerts on GitHub. On internal GitLab, Renovate's osvVulnerabilityAlerts plays the same role, and also covers uv transitive deps. So the setup is consistent across both.
Renovate doesn't apply minimumReleaseAge to lockFileMaintenance; it just runs uv lock --upgrade. That's why the cooldown has to live in pyproject.toml rather than only in Renovate config.
Implementation (outline)
template/pyproject.toml.jinja(and the template's ownpyproject.toml): addexclude-newer = "3 days"under[tool.uv].renovate.json/template/renovate.json.jinja:- set
automerge: false - add a weekly
schedule - set
minimumReleaseAge: "3 days" - set
lockFileMaintenance.dependencyDashboardApproval: true - group actions/pre-commit updates
- keep the existing template-managed ignores and the default
vulnerabilityAlerts
- set
periodic.yml:- add a weekly job that runs tests with
--upgradeinstead of--locked, across the supported Python matrix (the cooldown comes frompyproject.toml) - open or update a single issue on failure
- render
periodic.ymlunconditionally, since it's currently gated onsphinx, and make the linkcheck job conditional instead
- add a weekly job that runs tests with
- Docs:
- rewrite
renovate.mdto remove automerge and therenovate-approveapp, and to describe the dashboard lock refresh and security PRs - document the cooldown in
lock-requirements.md, including how to bypass it for an urgent fix withexclude-newer-package = { <pkg> = false }, to be removed after merge
- rewrite
Open questions
- Is the Mend-hosted Renovate app on ≥ 44.221.0, and does it have
readaccess to Dependabot alerts? Both are needed for transitive CVE fixes. - Verify on a test repo that Renovate opens a fix PR for a transitive-only vulnerable package in
uv.lock, and that a fix under 3 days old succeeds on a later run once the window passes. The transitive feature only landed on 2026-11-05. - Should the weekly periodic job also run
pip-auditagainst the locked environment, as a safety net while the transitive support beds in? - Does
dependencyDashboardApprovalbehave as expected forlockFileMaintenanceon our Renovate version? - Should repos that build and deploy images from the lock keep a scheduled (e.g. monthly) lock refresh in their own Renovate config?
- Align the cooldown window with python-zocalo, which uses the same pattern with 7 days.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Jinja
- Estrellas
- 25
- Forks
- 10
- Merge medio
- 1 d 8 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 4
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de DiamondLightSource/python-copier-template
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
Ignore renovate updates for ubuntu and ubuntu-devcontainerPosiblemente ocupada @KayMohh la tomó hace 9 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
documentation good first issue
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Todos los issues de DiamondLightSource/python-copier-template
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
bigbio/sdrf-pipelines#372 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
yara-x fails to build with rsa 0.10.0: unresolved import rsa::Pkcs1v15SignPosiblemente ocupada @CfirTsabari la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 87/100
VirusTotal/yara-x#865 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 69/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
backend prio:low
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
digitalfabrik/entitlementcard#3262 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
apache/cordova-ios#1751 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día