audit.sh: add a GDPR compliance check for repos that handle personal data
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 56/100
Línea de trabajo
Start with scripts/audit.sh, the existing optional site-file check, and scripts/lib/detect-privacy.sh; inspect tests/run.sh for fixture conventions. Add checks for the listed privacy signals, notices and contacts, and the consent reminder for tracking signals, while skipping dependency, lock and build output. Done means the specified fixtures pass, ShellCheck passes, Bash 3.2 works, and output describes the heuristic without claiming compliance or giving legal advice.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Problem
scripts/audit.sh checks for the standard OSS files and has no privacy check at all. A repo can load Google Analytics or collect sign-ups from EU visitors, have no privacy notice, and still get a perfect audit score. GDPR Article 13 requires telling people what is collected at the point of collection, so this is a gap in a tool whose job is getting a repo ready to go public.
Proposed check
Add a GDPR check that runs only when the repo shows signs of handling personal data, the same way the Optional site-file block only prints when detect_site_framework finds a site. Put detection in scripts/lib/detect-privacy.sh.
Signals to look for in manifests and source:
| Signal | Examples |
|---|---|
| Analytics and tracking | @vercel/analytics, posthog-js, mixpanel, @segment/*, @amplitude/*, react-ga*, gtag(, googletagmanager.com, connect.facebook.net, hotjar |
| Accounts and user data | @supabase/*, firebase, next-auth, @auth/*, @clerk/* |
| Error tracking | @sentry/* |
| Third-party assets fetched by the visitor's browser | fonts.googleapis.com |
When a signal is found, report:
- Whether a privacy notice exists (
PRIVACY.md, or aprivacypage or route for a detected site). - Whether a privacy contact is named in it.
- For analytics and tracking signals, a reminder to confirm consent is collected before non-essential cookies are set. A scan cannot prove this, so it stays a prompt.
Each finding names the signal and the file it was found in, so the result can be checked by hand.
Limits
This reports signals. It is not a legal review, and it can't tell whether a project is compliant. The output must say so and must never print "GDPR compliant".
Done when
- A fixture with
@vercel/analyticsand no privacy notice gets a warning naming the package and the file. - The same fixture with a
PRIVACY.mdgets no missing-notice warning. - A fixture with no signals prints nothing new, and its score is unchanged.
node_modules, lockfiles, and build output are not scanned.- The output states that this is a heuristic and not legal advice.
tests/run.shcovers the cases above,shellcheckpasses, and the script runs on bash 3.2.
A templates/PRIVACY.md that apply.sh can generate is a sensible follow-up, but it is out of scope here.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Shell
- Estrellas
- 16
- Forks
- 9
- Merge medio
- 1 d 17 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 1
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de CreativesLibrary/oss-launch
-
`audit.sh --json` for CI gatingAbiertoenhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 77/100
-
dependencies enhancement good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Todos los issues de CreativesLibrary/oss-launch
Issues similares
-
DeclareMiningJob.wtxid_list should be specified to be in block orderPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
stratum-mining/sv2-spec#253 ·
-
area:linux source:reader type:content-error
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
stephrobert/blog-roadmap#169 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
cisagov/skeleton-docker#322 ·
-
bot-found bug priority: P3
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
madenvel/KalinkaPlayer#543 ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 65/100