Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

OpenDots on FeltDB

Abierto
#83 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
15/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Necesita aclaración
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
sqlite, typescript

Línea de trabajo

Start with the linked OpenDotsFeltDB project and the issue’s description of OpenDots’ FeltDB migration and feltdb.flow contract. The issue does not name a requested change, files, or tests, so the first step is to clarify whether any integration work is wanted; it does not define what completion would look like.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Hi — I wanted to introduce myself and share some work I’ve been doing around OpenDots.
https://github.com/rkendel1/OpenDotsFeltDB

I’m building a software platform around the idea that AI agents should be able to build, operate, and manage real software — with a human staying in control of what matters.

One of the foundational pieces I’ve been building is FeltDB:

FeltDB
@feltdb/core on npm

FeltDB is a durable state layer designed around a different model from the traditional “application + database” approach. Instead of treating the database as an external system that applications map their objects into, the application’s state model itself becomes explicit and durable.

You define the application’s state as collections and relationships, FeltDB provides the durable storage and transactional semantics, and the application can treat that state as part of its architecture rather than maintaining a separate persistence model.

The important part is that FeltDB is completely free to use. I’m building it as a foundation that developers can actually adopt, rather than as a hosted database service with a usage meter attached to it.

I think there is a potentially significant architectural idea here: applications can have a formal, inspectable state contract rather than having persistence hidden behind an ORM, SQL schema, migrations, caches, and application-specific storage code. That’s what I mean when I describe FeltDB as a paradigm shift.

I’ve been testing that idea by applying it to OpenDots.

I migrated OpenDots completely off SQLite and onto FeltDB. OpenDots now has a feltdb.flow contract describing its 18 runtime collections and their relationships. The application validates that its runtime state matches that contract and fails closed if they drift apart. State survives process restarts, and SQLite is no longer part of the runtime architecture.

So OpenDots on FeltDB is now a real combination I’m developing, rather than just an experiment.

Around that I’m also building some other infrastructure:

OpenDots is the piece I’m most interested in here: the development control plane where humans manage projects, work, tasks, agents, context, approvals, and results.

Compute is an execution environment I’m building that gives software and agents a consistent computer/runtime they can actually work inside. I realize that overlaps conceptually with the “give an agent a computer” direction, so I’m intentionally not approaching this as a replacement for what OpenDots is doing. I’m more interested in seeing whether these ideas can complement one another.

Chip is the agent runtime — the thing that actually performs work for an agent — and AppPort is the capability protocol I’m using to connect applications, services, and execution environments.

The direction looks roughly like:

Human → OpenDots → execution environment → agent

with FeltDB providing the durable state underneath.

But the pieces are deliberately independent. FeltDB can be used without OpenDots. OpenDots can be used as its own control plane. Compute is its own execution platform. Chip is its own agent runtime.

I’m reaching out because I think the FeltDB/OpenDots combination is particularly interesting, and because I’d rather introduce the work directly than assume the projects have to become one thing.

If this is interesting to you, I’d be happy to show you what I’ve built and talk through where I think the architecture could go.

Thanks
Randy

Lenguaje dominante
TypeScript
Estrellas
2.8k
Forks
344
Merge medio
1 d 8 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
33

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de CopilotKit/OpenDots

Todos los issues de CopilotKit/OpenDots

Issues similares

Más issues de TypeScript

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.