ACP: mark the continuation nudge as harness-originated, emit it to clients, and allow disabling it
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- javascript
Línea de trabajo
Start in dist/cli.mjs at createContinuationProvider, endsWithDanglingIntent, and the dangling-intent and exclusion regexes; trace how the continuation message is injected and how ACP session updates are emitted. The issue asks for harness-origin labeling, a continuation_recovery update with the injected text and attempt counts, a way to disable or limit recovery, and exclusions for the three deferred-completion phrases. Done when these behaviors are covered and hosts can observe or disable the nudge.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Feature Description
In cmd acp (v1.88.5), when a turn's final text ends with "I'll …" or "Let me …", the continuation provider (createContinuationProvider / endsWithDanglingIntent) appends a user-role message:
You ended your turn right after saying you were about to do something, without doing it. Do it now — make the tool calls or produce the output you described; do not restate the plan. If the task is actually complete, state the final result instead.
For ACP hosts I'd like four changes:
- Mark the nudge as coming from the harness, for example with system-reminder style wording, instead of a plain user turn. Right now the model can't tell it apart from the real user.
- Emit it to the ACP client. Send a
session/updateforcontinuation_recovery(kind, attempt, maxAttempts) that includes the injected text. Today it has nosession/updatemapping, so the host can't show or explain it. - Make it possible to turn off. Add a config setting, env var, or
session/new_metafield that disables intent recovery or lowers its attempt count.createContinuationProvider({})is hardcoded today. - Recognise deferred-completion phrasing. Add "as soon as it lands", "when it finishes" and "once it completes" to the exclusion regex, so a turn that is deliberately waiting isn't treated as unfinished.
Use Case
ACP hosts that run sub-agents depend on the model ending its turn while background work runs. T3 Code my fork works this way: an async delegate_task tool result tells the model "Completion wakes this thread, so end your turn. Do not wait on it or poll it."
What happened in a real session (Command Code over ACP, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash):
- The model delegated a review to another agent (Opus 5.5) and correctly ended its turn with: "I'll report its verdict as soon as it lands."
- Two seconds later Command Code injected the "Do it now" nudge as a user message.
- The model's reasoning: "the user overrode: … Do it now." It polled the delegate four times, stopped waiting, and did the delegated work itself. That included destructive file changes the delegate had been asked to review first.
- The host's UI showed no injected message, so from the user's side the model just turned impatient for no reason.
With the nudge marked as harness-originated, visible to the client, and possible to turn off, hosts could either show it or turn it off for sessions that intentionally wait.
Additional Context
- The code is in
dist/cli.mjs:createContinuationProvider,endsWithDanglingIntent, and the dangling-intent and exclusion regexes. The counter allows 2 intent nudges per streak and resets only after a turn with tool calls. - My T3 Code fork works around this on the host side by changing the delegate tool's wording so models end with a status line ("It is running.") instead of a promise. That only helps when the model follows the wording, which is why an upstream fix matters: https://github.com/timm-u/t3code
- Related: a Windows bug where editor-supplied stdio MCP servers fail silently when the command path has spaces (filed separately). In this same session it was the reason the model fell back to shell-based tool calls in the first place.
How important is this to you?
Important for my workflow
- Lenguaje dominante
- Sin datos de lenguaje
- Estrellas
- 4.2k
- Forks
- 377
- Merge medio
- 1 d 17 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 7
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de CommandCodeAI/command-code
-
Provider /v1/messages rejects role:"system" inside messages[] — Claude Code ≥ 2.1.154 incompatibleAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#1085 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Feature request: auto-reconnect remote control (/rc) after restartPosiblemente ocupada @aliarain la tomó hace 20 días. Abiertop2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#992 · 1 comentario · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#933 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#855 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
grep tool passes empty file type to ripgrepPosiblemente ocupada @ahmadbilaldev la tomó hace 19 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#655 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de CommandCodeAI/command-code
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
UKGovernmentBEIS/inspect_ai#6512 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent#221 ·
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
developmentwithyash/yaan#60 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area: deals priority: normal
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 79/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días