Adopt the AI-native SDLC and repository policies

Abierto
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#634 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

@goanpeca ya está trabajando en esto.

Desde el 28/10/2026.

  • #635 de @goanpeca — abierto

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
20/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Stack tecnológico
python
Área
developer-experience, devops, documentation

Línea de trabajo

Review the proposed files and workflow in the issue, especially intent/review-process/intent.md, README.release.md, and the existing nox sessions and towncrier checks. The issue spans repository policy, contributor guidance, release documentation, CI decisions, and a maintainer review proposal; first read the linked pull request and confirm with maintainers which parts remain in scope. Done means the agreed policies and workflows are documented and any admin decisions are recorded.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

enhancement

Problem

More and more b2-sdk-python PRs are written with coding agents, and nothing in the repo tells an agent (or a new contributor) how this codebase works or what reviewers keep asking for. The rules live in reviewers' heads and in past review threads: towncrier fragments in changelog.d/ with the right name and type, changes made in b2sdk/_internal and exported through the right b2sdk/vN apiver layer without breaking older layers, raw_simulator.py kept in step with raw_api.py, tests that fail when the fix is reverted, retry and Retry-After parity, and the .sdkharness contract checks that CI does not run. The release steps are a single line in README.release.md.

The repo also lacks the standard policy files: no AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md, REVIEW.md, SECURITY.md, CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, PR template or issue forms.

Proposed outcome

  • Agents and contributors read the recurring review lessons before they write code (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/review-lessons.md), and reviewers follow one written process (REVIEW.md).
  • Keep towncrier and the existing CI changelog check; document them where agents look, and make the local check easy to run.
  • A documented release process (RELEASE.md, replacing README.release.md), security policy, code of conduct, PR template and issue forms.
  • One documented local command sequence that mirrors CI (nox -s lint, unit, build, doc, towncrier_check).
  • Larger changes start from intent/<slug>/intent.md → spec.md → plan.md, following the AI-native SDLC playbook, with the playbook skills in .claude/skills/.
  • A proposal, for the maintainers to decide, on scaling human review by risk (tiers, re-approval on new commits, required conversation resolution, automated AI and security review, merge queue, reviewer evals, metrics).

Settings that need a repo admin

  • Enable private vulnerability reporting (needed by SECURITY.md and the issue form's security link).
  • Decide whether the changelog validation step should become a required check on master.
  • Confirm which branch protection is applied to master.
  • Review intent/review-process/intent.md and accept, reshape or close it.
Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
214
Forks
68
Merge medio
51 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
6

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de Backblaze/b2-sdk-python

Todos los issues de Backblaze/b2-sdk-python

Issues similares

Más issues de Python

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.