azure-eventhub migration guide: legacy checkpoint sample writes "None" metadata for partitions that were never checkpointed
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
@hidingmyname ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 29/10/2026.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 78/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- azure, python
- Área
- documentation
Línea de trabajo
Abre sdk/eventhub/azure-eventhub/migration_guide.md y revisa el fragmento de migración de puntos de control heredados. Comprueba cómo trata las entradas a las que les falta offset o sequence_number, y verifica que el prefijo use EVENT_HUB_HOSTNAME, que es la variable definida. La tarea estará terminada cuando el ejemplo omita las entradas que no pueden formar un punto de control y construya el prefijo del blob a partir de la variable definida.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Library name
azure-eventhub (migration_guide.md), azure-eventhub-checkpointstoreblob
Describe the bug
The "migrate checkpoint data from the legacy format" snippet at the end of
sdk/eventhub/azure-eventhub/migration_guide.md converts every blob in the
legacy EventProcessorHost container unconditionally:
# Translate each legacy checkpoint, storing offset and sequence data into correct
# blob to align with V5 BlobCheckpointStore.
for checkpoint in legacy_checkpoints:
metadata = {
"offset": str(checkpoint["offset"]),
"sequencenumber": str(checkpoint["sequence_number"]),
}
name = "{}{}".format(prefix, checkpoint["partition_id"])
container_client.upload_blob(name, data="", metadata=metadata)
The legacy (1.x) EventProcessorHost creates a lease blob for every partition
up front, before anything has been checkpointed. In
azure_storage_checkpoint_manager.py (create_lease_if_not_exists_async) a
fresh AzureBlobLease() is serialized with offset = None and
sequence_number = None, so a partition that was never checkpointed has a blob
like:
{"partition_id": "3", "sequence_number": null, "owner": null, "token": null,
"epoch": 0, "event_processor_context": null, "offset": null}
json.loads turns those into None, and the snippet writes the metadata
offset="None", sequencenumber="None".
The v5 store then can't read the container. BlobCheckpointStore.list_checkpoints
(azure-eventhub-checkpointstoreblob/.../_blobstoragecs.py, and the same line in
the -aio package) does:
"offset": str(metadata["offset"]),
"sequence_number": int(metadata["sequencenumber"]),
int("None") raises ValueError. Because list_checkpoints reads all
partitions in one call, a single unconverted partition makes the whole call
fail. EventProcessor catches the exception in its load-balancing loop, logs
"An error occurred while load-balancing and claiming ownership" and retries,
so the consumer stays up but never starts receiving on any partition it
newly claims.
A second, smaller problem in the same snippet: it defines
EVENT_HUB_HOSTNAME = os.environ["EVENT_HUB_HOSTNAME"] # <your-eventhub-namespace>.servicebus.windows.net
but builds the blob prefix from a different name that is never defined:
prefix = "{}/{}/{}/checkpoint/".format(
EVENT_HUB_FULLY_QUALIFIED_NAMESPACE.lower(),
so as written it fails with NameError before any checkpoint is uploaded.
Why it matters
This snippet is for people moving off the 1.x processor, and having some idle
or never-checkpointed partitions is normal (new partitions, low-traffic
partitions, a consumer group that was only partly used). After running the
migration as documented, the v5 processor connects, logs warnings over and
over, and receives nothing. The error points at load balancing rather than at
the migrated blobs, so it is hard to trace back to the migration step.
Suggested fix
Skip legacy entries that have no checkpoint (a v5 processor will just use its
starting_position for those partitions), and use the variable that is
actually defined:
prefix = "{}/{}/{}/checkpoint/".format(
- EVENT_HUB_FULLY_QUALIFIED_NAMESPACE.lower(),
+ EVENT_HUB_HOSTNAME.lower(),
EVENT_HUB_NAME.lower(),
EVENT_HUB_CONSUMER_GROUP.lower(),
)
# Translate each legacy checkpoint, storing offset and sequence data into correct
# blob to align with V5 BlobCheckpointStore.
for checkpoint in legacy_checkpoints:
+ # Partitions that were never checkpointed have no offset/sequence number;
+ # skip them so the V5 processor falls back to its starting position.
+ if checkpoint.get("offset") is None or checkpoint.get("sequence_number") is None:
+ continue
metadata = {
"offset": str(checkpoint["offset"]),
"sequencenumber": str(checkpoint["sequence_number"]),
}
Both fields are skipped together rather than writing only offset (as .NET
does), because the Python BlobCheckpointStore requires sequencenumber to be
present — metadata["sequencenumber"] would raise KeyError otherwise.
Upstream reference
The .NET migration guide had the same unconditional conversion and fixed it in
Azure/azure-sdk-for-net@2597c2265a ("[Event Hubs] Checkpoint Migration Sample
Tweak", Azure/azure-sdk-for-net#29129, 2022-06-06) — legacy entries with no
offset are skipped when reading, and a missing sequence number is no longer
written as a value:
--- a/sdk/eventhub/Azure.Messaging.EventHubs/MigrationGuide.md
+++ b/sdk/eventhub/Azure.Messaging.EventHubs/MigrationGuide.md
@@ -818,10 +818,14 @@ foreach (var checkpoint in legacyCheckpoints)
{
var metadata = new Dictionary<string, string>()
{
- { offsetKey, checkpoint.Offset.ToString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture) },
- { sequenceKey, checkpoint.SequenceNumber.ToString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture) }
+ { offsetKey, checkpoint.Offset.ToString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture) }
};
+ if (checkpoint.SequenceNumber.HasValue)
+ {
+ metadata[sequenceKey] = checkpoint.SequenceNumber.Value.ToString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
+ }
+
BlobClient blobClient = storageClient.GetBlobClient($"{ prefix }{ checkpoint.PartitionId }");
using var content = new MemoryStream(Array.Empty<byte>());
@@ -857,7 +861,11 @@ private async Task<List<MigrationCheckpoint>> ReadLegacyCheckpoints(
await (storageClient.GetBlobClient(blobItem.Name)).DownloadToAsync(blobContentStream);
var checkpoint = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<MigrationCheckpoint>(Encoding.UTF8.GetString(blobContentStream.ToArray()));
- checkpoints.Add(checkpoint);
+
+ if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(checkpoint.Offset))
+ {
+ checkpoints.Add(checkpoint);
+ }
}
return checkpoints;
The idea carries over directly — don't turn an empty legacy lease into a
checkpoint. The only Python-specific difference is that the v5 store here
needs both fields, so the entry should be skipped whenever either one is
missing.
I can submit a PR for this.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 5.6k
- Forks
- 3.4k
- Merge medio
- 2 d 16 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 192
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Azure/azure-sdk-for-python
-
[Teams Chatbot]: Clarify Python dev-feed publication from a branch versus PyPI releasePosiblemente ocupada @jianingwang123 la tomó hace 15 días. Abiertocustomer-reported question
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#49548 · 1 comentario · 2 reacciones · 2 asignados ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
azure-ai-evaluation: a content-harm score of 0 (no harm) is parsed as NaN in _parse_content_harm_response (numeric branch uses 0 < x instead of 0 <= x)Posiblemente ocupada @pujitha24 la tomó hace 31 días. AbiertoEvaluation Service Attention
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#49190 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Update CODEOWNERSAbierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#49183 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
azure-ai-evaluation: PromptyEvaluatorBase falls back to the first digit anywhere in the judge's reply, and the threshold turns a stray digit into a wrong pass/fail (15 evaluators)Posiblemente ocupada @wasim-builds la tomó hace 25 días. AbiertoEvaluation Service Attention
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#49153 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
azure-search-documents ContentUnderstandingSkill is missing model_name and model_deploymentPosiblemente ocupada @wasim-builds la tomó hace 25 días. AbiertoSearch Service Attention
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#48555 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de Azure/azure-sdk-for-python
Issues similares
-
bug
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
awslabs/visual-asset-management-system#937 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Admin member of a research group cannot see the HX2 allocation until they've been added to itAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
follow-up
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días