`extract` reports extraction errors / exits with code 1 for APIs using `set-body template="liquid"` with `{{ }}` expressions
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 58/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- azure, typescript
Línea de trabajo
Empieza ejecutando el comando indicado apiops extract contra una política de API que contenga set-body template="liquid" con expresiones {{ }}, usando el registro de depuración para rastrear las búsquedas de named values. Sigue la ruta de extracción que analiza las expresiones de la política y verifica que las expresiones de Liquid no se traten como named values. Se considera completado cuando la extracción informa de cero errores y termina con el código 0 si los recursos de API referenciados son válidos.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Command that triggered the bug
apiops extract --log-level debug --resource-group --service-name --output ./artifacts --filter ./configuration.extractor.yaml --subscription-id --remove-stale
Expected behavior
Extraction completes with exit code 0 for an API whose policy uses set-body template="liquid" to build or transform a request/response body, as long as the API and its real named values/backends actually exist and are reachable.
Actual behavior
The extraction otherwise finishes fine. All APIs, operations, and real named values get written to the output directory. But the run still reports errors and exits with code 1:
[INFO] Extraction complete: 19 resources extracted, 4 errors
With --log-level debug on, I can see the CLI issuing GET .../namedValues/<value> requests where <value> isn't a named value at all. It looks like it was pulled straight out of a {{ ... }} expression inside one of our set-body template="liquid"> blocks:
[DEBUG] HTTP GET https://management.azure.com/.../namedValues/context.Request.MatchedParameters%5B%22id%22%5D?api-version=2025-09-01-preview
[DEBUG] HTTP GET https://management.azure.com/.../namedValues/body.envelope.body.Test_Result.test?api-version=2025-09-01-preview
[DEBUG] HTTP GET https://management.azure.com/.../namedValues/body.envelope.body.fault.faultcode?api-version=2025-09-01-preview
[DEBUG] HTTP GET https://management.azure.com/.../namedValues/body.envelope.body.fault.faultstring?api-version=2025-09-01-preview
None of those are named values in our APIM instance. They're Liquid interpolation expressions from a set-body template="liquid" policy we use to build a SOAP request and reshape the SOAP response into JSON. Each lookup 404s, and each 404 seems to get counted toward the "errors" total. That matches up exactly: 4 Liquid expressions, 4 reported errors. The nonzero exit code then fails our CI pipeline step even though nothing is actually broken or missing.
To work around this we rewrote the affected set-body template="liquid"> blocks as plain C# expressions (<set-body>@{ ... return ...; }</set-body>) instead of Liquid templates. That removed the {{ }} syntax from the policy entirely, and the same extraction now completes with 0 errors and exit code 0. But with the Liquid template the policy would be easier to read and understand.
apiops CLI version
1.0.1
Environment details
- Azure DevOps pipeline, Ubuntu 24.04 hosted agent
- Node.js 24.x
apiops extractinvoked vianpx, with--filterpointing at a YAML filter config- The affected API's policy has three
<set-body template="liquid">blocks: one building a SOAP request body (interpolating a template parameter), and two transforming the SOAP response into JSON (interpolating values pulled out of the parsed SOAP envelope)
CI/CD environment
Azure DevOps
Is this bug blocking you?
No
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 29
- Forks
- 10
- Merge medio
- 1 d 14 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 22
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Azure/apiops-cli
-
type:question
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Azure/apiops-cli#277 ·
-
type:documentation
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 94/100
Azure/apiops-cli#250 ·
-
Documentation P2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Azure/apiops-cli#24 · 1 comentario ·
-
type:bug
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
Azure/apiops-cli#291 ·
-
type:feature
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 30/100
Azure/apiops-cli#275 · 2 comentarios · 2 reacciones ·
Todos los issues de Azure/apiops-cli
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
copse-dev/agent-pane#2953 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Eynzof/Hermes-CN-Desktop#610 ·
-
[Bug]: Matrix progress drafts fail with "Matrix runtime not initialized" during tool activity Abiertobug clawsweeper:linked-pr-open clawsweeper:needs-live-repro clawsweeper:no-new-fix-pr impact:message-loss issue-rating: 🐚 platinum hermit P2 regression
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
Client support matrix inclusion Abiertoenhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
calcite-components needs triage refactor
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Esri/calcite-design-system#15203 ·