Onboarding funnel events cannot be correlated into a single run
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 55/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
Línea de trabajo
Comienza por la ruta de entrada de la CLI y el inicio del worker descritos en el issue, y luego sigue cómo se crea el sobre de evento de telemetría existente en cada thread. Se considera terminado cuando cada evento de onboarding y gateway-auth listado de un lanzamiento lleva el mismo identificador no persistido en ambas instancias del módulo de telemetría; verifica el flujo de telemetría existente y, si está dentro del alcance, la condición de carrera en la creación de machine-id.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Problem
Onboarding telemetry events cannot be correlated into a single user's funnel, because the events that make up one first run are emitted from two different threads at times when no common identifier exists.
altimate-code tui runs the TUI on the process main thread and the HTTP server in a worker. Each loads its own instance of the telemetry module. The first-run UI events (onboarding_started, model_picker_shown, provider_selected, the Big Pickle pair, onboarding_completed, the scan-gate pair) and the gateway auth events all fire before any chat session exists, so they stamp an empty session_id and land under the synthetic startup session. The activation events (activation_menu_shown, activation_job_selected, first_job_completed, first_prompt_sent) fire later from a real session and carry its real id.
The result: the top of the funnel and the bottom of the funnel share no key.
There is a fallback identifier — machine_id, a random UUID at ~/.altimate/machine-id — but it is unreliable for exactly this case. On a genuinely new install both threads can observe the file missing and independently create it, so a single first run can emit two different machine_id values. (That race is worth fixing regardless, and is cheap: create the file exclusively and re-read on collision.)
Impact
Countable today: impressions, choices, gateway auth outcomes, scan/skip splits, sample setup invocations — anything that is a simple tally of one event type.
Not answerable today:
- End-to-end conversion. "How many people who saw the picker ended up connected?" requires linking a
model_picker_shownto anonboarding_completed. - Per-attempt drop-off.
onboarding_abandonedcarries alast_stage, but it cannot be tied to the events that led there. - Retry behaviour. A user who fails gateway auth and succeeds on the second attempt is indistinguishable from two users.
time_to_connect_msattribution when a user retries.
In other words: the events are individually correct, but the funnel is not reconstructable, which is the main thing the taxonomy exists for.
Proposal
Generate one random id per process launch and stamp it on every onboarding event, from both threads.
- Generated once in the CLI entry path, before either thread emits.
- Passed to the worker at startup so both telemetry module instances use the same value.
- Not persisted, not derived from anything about the machine or user, and not reused across launches. It carries no identifying information — it exists only to group events that belong to the same run.
A launch is the right grain here: onboarding state already resets on every process start by design, so "one launch" and "one onboarding attempt" are the same thing in practice.
Alternatives considered
- Reuse
machine_id. Groups a machine, not an attempt, so retries and repeat launches collapse together. Also affected by the creation race above. - Reuse
session_id. Does not exist for most of the funnel, which is the original problem. - Fix attribution after the fact by joining on timestamp proximity. Fragile, and impossible to do correctly for concurrent instances on the same machine.
Notes
This does not require a new sink, endpoint, or storage. It is one value threaded through the existing event envelope.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 813
- Forks
- 134
- Merge medio
- 2 d 2 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 67
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de AltimateAI/altimate-code
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1359 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1323 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1288 ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1285 ·
-
privacy: Altimate Base consent dialog no longer discloses persistent per-installation identifier Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1284 ·
Todos los issues de AltimateAI/altimate-code
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
bcgov/bc-wallet-mobile#4761 · 1 comentario ·
-
external-issue to-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
-
area-deployment area-integrations triage:bot-seen
Dificultad 2/5 Medio día Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
-
refactor
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100