Fold a rule and the defect it generalizes into one briefing slot

Open
  • Is something wrong?
#296 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
python
Domain
ai-infra-agents

Research direction

Read the ADR referenced by the issue and inspect evals/preflight.py, the calibrated default, and REPORT §4w. Measure whether typed edges applied after ranking can fold r_pin_gating_tools and d_unpinned_linter into one briefing slot without using edges to find lessons; compare the bench and pre-flight results. The issue does not identify specific tests or define success thresholds.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Under the calibrated default, the eval task ci_linter's rule (r_pin_gating_tools) clears the line and ranks sixth behind the cap of five, while d_unpinned_linter, the defect it generalizes with the same fix, takes a slot (evals/preflight.py accepted gap, REPORT §4w). Two slots for one lesson. Typed edges after ranking (never to find lessons, per the ADR) could fold a rule and its defect into one slot. Measure the effect on the bench and the pre-flight. Refs #291.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
1
Forks
1
Avg merge
5h 10m
Merged PRs (30d)
127

Getting set up

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from emeraldleaf/okl

All issues in emeraldleaf/okl

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.