Add an Invertible typeclass?

Open
#86 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

  • #148 by @phischu — closed without merging

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
30/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
haskell
Domain
data

Research direction

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points; start by reading the existing matrix inversion APIs and typeclass conventions in the repository. The design is complete when a coherent Invertible abstraction and the requested M22, M33, and M44 instances are defined, with tests covering generalized inversion.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

feature request

To make it easier to write generalized code involving matrix inversion, it might be useful to have an Invertible typeclass with instances for Fractional a => M22 a, Fractional a => M33 a, and Fractional a => M44 a.

Dominant language
Haskell
Stars
220
Forks
55
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Getting set up

This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from ekmett/linear

All issues in ekmett/linear

Similar issues

More Haskell issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.