fix(skill): ownership check graded must when sibling checks are out of view
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 68/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- javascript
Research direction
Start by reading SKILL.md and security.md, then inspect the dotnet eval fixture and expected.md mentioned in the issue. Update the access-control guidance so findings without visible ownership evidence go under Questions, and run the dotnet eval three consecutive times. Done when those runs pass and the dotnet-webhook and nestjs findings retain their previous grades.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
What
On the dotnet fixture the review grades a missing ownership check (IDOR) on a new endpoint as must, while expected.md asks for a question unless sibling endpoints visibly check ownership.
Why
It is the one false positive in the v0.2.0 eval runs. A must on an assumption about unseen code breaks the "proof or it's dropped" rule.
Acceptance criteria
- SKILL.md and security.md say that an access-control finding needs either a visible sibling that checks ownership or a visible data model that ties the resource to the caller; otherwise it goes under Questions.
- The
dotneteval reports it under Questions in three consecutive runs. - The
dotnet-webhookandnestjsaccess-control findings stay graded as before.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from devmaxxx/stackwise
-
enhancement good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
bug eval
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 66/100
-
bug
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
All issues in devmaxxx/stackwise
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
evi0s/WMPFDebugger#303 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
HakanSeven12/OpenCADStudio#2257 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 64/100
-
bug good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
bug code-annotation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
quarto-dev/quarto-cli#15215 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day