[coverage] Conformance findings: AUTH-019
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 66/100
Research direction
Start by reading the Go driver’s OAuth M2M scope handling and locate the tests for TestOAuthM2MTokenRequestUsesConfiguredScopes; the issue does not name their paths. Compare configured, whitespace-padded, blank, and unset scopes against the expected token request in the issue. Done when both Thrift and SEA send one sql token for sloppy scopes, and blank or unset scopes request all-apis and complete successfully.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-go. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-go) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire.
Findings
- AUTH-019 [thrift]: Thrift OAuth M2M forwards configured scopes verbatim: inner whitespace is not split and duplicates are not dropped (" sql sql " -> two
sqltokens), and a whitespace-only entry is sent as-is so the token endpoint rejects the client_credentials grant with invalid_scope instead of falling back to all-apis- failing test:
TestOAuthM2MTokenRequestUsesConfiguredScopes(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
- AUTH-019 [sea]: SEA/kernel OAuth M2M forwards configured scopes verbatim: a scope entry's inner whitespace is not split and duplicates are not dropped, so " sql sql " is sent as two
sqltokens instead of one- failing test:
TestOAuthM2MTokenRequestUsesConfiguredScopes(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
- AUTH-019: OAuth M2M forwards configured scopes verbatim: a scope entry's inner whitespace is not split and duplicates are not dropped (" sql sql " is sent as two
sqltokens on both thrift and sea), and on the Thrift path a whitespace-only entry is sent as-is so the workspace token endpoint rejects the client_credentials grant with invalid_scope instead of falling back to all-apis (the kernel/SEA path handles the blank entry correctly)
Reproduce & Expected
AUTH-019 — Verifies that the driver's OAuth scopes option decides what the client-credentials (M2M) token request asks for, instead of always requesting all-apis, so a service principal whose secret is scoped…
Reproduce:
SELECT CURRENT_USER() AS user
SELECT CURRENT_USER() AS user
SELECT CURRENT_USER() AS user
SELECT CURRENT_USER() AS user
Expected (per the shared spec):
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- full assertion contract:
result:
- label: configured_scopes
oauth_token_request_scope_tokens:
grant_type: client_credentials
equals:
- sql
- label: configured_scopes
row_count: 1
- label: sloppy_scopes
oauth_token_request_scope_tokens:
grant_type: client_credentials
equals:
- sql
- label: sloppy_scopes
row_count: 1
- label: blank_scopes
oauth_token_request_scope_tokens:
grant_type: client_credentials
equals:
- all-apis
- label: blank_scopes
row_count: 1
- label: unset_scopes
oauth_token_request_scope_tokens:
grant_type: client_credentials
equals:
- all-apis
- label: unset_scopes
row_count: 1
protocol:
thrift:
- call_min:
method: OpenSession
min: 1
sea:
- call_min:
operation: CreateSession
min: 1
Context
- The behavior was first fixed in a DIFFERENT driver — reference PR: https://github.com/databricks/databricks-sql-nodejs/pull/583 — which seeded the shared language-neutral spec. This issue tracks the same conformance gap in databricks/databricks-sql-go; the reference PR is for cross-referencing the intended behavior, NOT a change to this repo.
- Coverage PR carrying the reproducing xfail test(s): https://github.com/databricks/databricks-driver-test/pull/2020
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 54
- Forks
- 71
- Avg merge
- 16h 3m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 21
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from databricks/databricks-sql-go
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
databricks/databricks-sql-go#494 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 54/100
databricks/databricks-sql-go#547 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
databricks/databricks-sql-go#521 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 56/100
databricks/databricks-sql-go#520 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
engineer-bot
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 49/100
databricks/databricks-sql-go#517 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in databricks/databricks-sql-go
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
kind/features
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 73/100
TencentBlueKing/bk-nodemgr#3991 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
meta
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
last9/last9-mcp-server#554 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Plain-http federation signing external_url fails startup with "invalid federation request signature"Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day