Tavily web search and extract for AppKit apps
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- node.js, typescript
- Domain
- api, backend, developer-experience
Research direction
Start by comparing the proposed packages/appkit/src/plugins/tavily/ structure with the existing genie and serving plugins, then read the agents ToolProvider contract and the appkit plugin sync conventions. The v1 work is done when search and extract, the secret manifest, config schema, toolkit integration, tests, and a docs page are covered, with the packaging, beta-gating, and dependency questions resolved.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
We propose adding a Tavily plugin to AppKit, giving Databricks Apps first-class access to real-time web data: search, content extraction, and (later) crawling and deep research. Tavily is a web access API built specifically for LLMs and agents — results come back as clean, relevance-scored, LLM-ready content rather than raw HTML.
We're the Tavily team, and we'd like to contribute this plugin ourselves — this issue is to align on scope and design before we open the PR.
Motivation
AppKit apps are strong on Lakehouse-native data (analytics, Genie, vector search) but have no built-in way to reach outside the workspace. Common patterns this unlocks:
- Grounded AI agents — the agents plugin resolves
plugin:NAMEtool providers; a Tavily plugin exposing atoolkit()would let any AppKit agent do web search/extraction with one line of frontmatter (tools: [plugin:tavily]), complementing Genie and vector-search for questions that need current, external information. - RAG enrichment — combine vector-search results over internal docs with fresh web context in serving/agents flows.
- Data enrichment apps — enrich entities from Lakehouse tables (companies, products, tickers) with live web data.
Proposed design
A core plugin following the existing conventions (packages/appkit/src/plugins/tavily/):
Manifest — one required secret resource (permission: READ) holding the Tavily API key, surfaced via a TAVILY_API_KEY env field, so databricks apps init and appkit plugin sync wire it up like any other resource. No OBO semantics — the key is app-level, like a service principal credential.
Server API — typed methods plus injected routes:
const app = await createApp({ plugins: [new TavilyPlugin({ /* defaults */ })] });
await app.tavily.search("latest EU AI Act enforcement actions", {
maxResults: 5,
timeRange: "month",
});
await app.tavily.extract(["https://example.com/report"], { format: "markdown" });
POST /api/tavily/searchandPOST /api/tavily/extract, validated with Zod like other plugins.- All outbound calls go through
this.execute(), so caching (search results are very cacheable), retry, timeout, and OpenTelemetry tracing come for free from the interceptor chain.
Agents integration — implement the ToolProvider contract (toolkit()), so agents get tavily_search / tavily_extract tools, subject to the existing tool-approval gate.
Config schema (sketch) —
{
"apiKey": { /* from secret resource / TAVILY_API_KEY */ },
"search": { "maxResults": 5, "searchDepth": "basic", "includeDomains": [], "excludeDomains": [] },
"cache": { "ttl": 300000 },
"timeout": 30000
}
Scope
- v1:
search+extract, manifest, config schema, agentstoolkit(), tests, docs page. - Later (separate PRs):
crawl/map, deepresearch(long-running — fits the SSE streaming machinery), and optionally anappkit-uiresults component.
Open questions for maintainers
- Packaging — core plugin in
packages/appkit(like genie/serving), or would you prefer third-party integrations in a separate package? This would be the first non-Databricks-service plugin, so happy to follow whatever precedent you want to set. - Beta gating — should it ship via
beta-exportsinitially? - Dependency policy — we'd use the official
@tavily/coreSDK (MIT); fine, or do you prefer plainfetchfor supply-chain reasons?
If this direction sounds good, we'll follow up with the PR.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 119
- Forks
- 36
- Avg merge
- 4d 16h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 37
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from databricks/appkit
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
databricks/appkit#729 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
@databricks/lakebase: pool drops maxLifetimeSeconds and other pg options, so connections never recycle and Unity Catalog claims access fails after 4 hoursPossibly taken @billmcmillin claimed this 5 days ago. Open
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 20/100
databricks/appkit#718 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
databricks/appkit#699 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
Difficulty 3/5 Half a day Newbie friendliness 42/100
databricks/appkit#656 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 28/100
databricks/appkit#648 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
All issues in databricks/appkit
Similar issues
-
Add "append" and "prepend" slots for vue-vuetify extended renderersPossibly taken @simeyc claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
eclipsesource/jsonforms#2668 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
README の通知条件を実際の判定処理に合わせるPossibly taken @unhappychoice claimed this today. Openfactory:in-progress priority:medium
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
unhappychoice/oss-issue-opener#395 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug Website
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
OWASP/OWASP-Hunting#88 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day