Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

ICOM IC-910H doppler control semi-functional with current hamlib

Open
#367 8 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
22/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
c
Domain
desktop-dev

Research direction

Start with the radio setup notes in doc/notes/ic-910.txt and the rig-control path that talks to rigctld (hamlib model 3044). The open question is whether VFO_A/VFO_B should map to Main/Sub in satellite mode, which needs a rig and hardware to reproduce. Done means the downlink and uplink tracking stay locked without the rejected-command spam, which can't be confirmed without an IC-910H attached.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

radio

Hey,

I've seen multiple issues, some closed, some still open, with conflicting issues regarding doppler control on the IC-910.
I did some tests and wanted to share the current state (and if i find ideas how to fix it) :

Issue:

  • Doppler control with gpredict/hamlib/ic910 not working
  • only downlink is corrected, rigctld shows rejected command errors
  • if the VFO knob on the radio is turned, the frequency jumps back and forth a couple of kHz
  • disengages after some seconds

Steps to reproduce:

  • rigctld Hamlib 4.6~git 2024-08-19T14:01:05Z SHA=137231 64-bit
  • gpredict 2.2.1
  • radio setup as per https://github.com/csete/gpredict/blob/master/doc/notes/ic-910.txt:
    grafik
  • rigctld commands:
    • rigctld -m 3044 --serial-speed=19200 -r /dev/ttyUSB0 -vvvvv
    • adding --vfo has no apparent effect
    • adding --twiddle_timeout=2s decreases the frequency jumps a little but sometimes jumps still occur
  • IC-910 in satellite mode
  • Result:
    • gpredict sets inital downlink frequency, and tracks it for some seconds, than disengages

The rigctld log is spammed with rejected commands: https://pastebin.com/asNU0FjC
The logs show errors when addressing VFO_A/B but in this mode I think it should be Main/Sub?

I also tried this branch with no success

Did anyone get it to work lately?
All the best,
Joshua

Dominant language
C
Stars
1.2k
Forks
305
Avg merge
8h 48m
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Getting set up

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from csete/gpredict

All issues in csete/gpredict

Similar issues

More C issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.