Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Parser fuzz validation targets: findings ledger and kill criterion (#1781 B2)

Open Beginner friendly
#1,869 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
68/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
github-actions, typescript

Research direction

Start with .github/workflows/replays-nightly.yml and scripts/fuzz/validation-arbitraries.test.ts to understand the Parser Fuzz Lane and its validation targets. Review nightly findings and append one ledger row per finding, identifying real defects versus phantoms. Done means the tracker records each finding and the stated phantom or six-month yield criteria can be applied at review.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

The parser fuzz lane's validation targets (cli-validation, maestro-validation, added in #1866 for #1781 B2) ship with a kill criterion that nothing currently records, so this is their live tracker — the same treatment #1823 gave the subprocess-stub project.

What the lane costs

Nightly Parser Fuzz Lane in .github/workflows/replays-nightly.yml: 38,000 cases x 7 targets, measured at parity with the pre-B2 five-target/50k budget (16.9s vs 16.8s on a quiet host; the CI step was 21s before). No new job, no macOS occupancy. PR-time cost is scripts/fuzz/validation-arbitraries.test.ts (~0.4s, unit-core) plus the corpus replay that already existed.

Findings ledger (append one row per nightly finding)

date run target · class real defect or phantom? outcome
(none yet)

A phantom is a case whose expectation was wrong rather than the parser — a generator drift, not a bug. One was caught pre-merge (--scale=1.110000000000017, float modulo drifting past a fractional max) and fixed before landing; validation-arbitraries.test.ts exists to catch that class at PR time.

Kill criteria (either fires ⇒ delete the two validation targets, keep the classic five)

  1. Phantoms: a phantom finding reaches a nightly twice.
  2. Yield: no real defect found by either validation target in 6 months of nightlies — review on 2027-02-19.

The calibration behind the lane (#1781, B3 comment) measured reach, not yield: it proved the targets can rediscover seeded defects of the shape they aim at, and explicitly did not predict how many unknown defects they will find. Criterion 2 is what tests yield, which is why this ledger exists.

Notes for whoever reviews this

  • Only two of the eight calibration rows were genuine generated new reach (#1433 via cli-validation; a silently-accepted Maestro field via maestro-validation); two more were new detection class but rediscovered by pinned seed cases, and four were already within the classic targets' reach. Judge yield against the first two.
  • Adding a mutation class is a few lines in scripts/fuzz/validation-arbitraries.ts; classes whose whole input space is a handful of strings belong in the target's seed list instead.

Umbrella: #1781 (item B2/B3). Lane: #1414. Sibling tracker: #1823.

Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
4.7k
Forks
304
Avg merge
11h 6m
Merged PRs (30d)
554

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from callstack/agent-device

All issues in callstack/agent-device

Similar issues

More TypeScript issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.