Will it include the base attribute?

Open
#19 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
javascript
Domain
web-dev

Research direction

Start by comparing path-browserify's browser behavior with the Node.js path module and the linked Stack Overflow case about the application base attribute. The issue names no source file or test; done would require establishing whether path-browserify should account for the base attribute and defining the expected behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Ran into this issue when using the note path module:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59605333/not-using-the-base-attribute-when-making-domsanitizer-api-calls

The path created ends up prefixing the path from the application base attribute, and this is undesired.

Just curious whether this module will duplicate that behavior?

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
192
Forks
54
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from browserify/path-browserify

All issues in browserify/path-browserify

Similar issues

More JavaScript issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.