Add durable backing store behind `TaskStore`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100
Research direction
Start by locating the current in-memory TaskStore and the API and CLI entry points that construct or use it. Compare the existing add, get, list, complete, and delete surface with a sqlite3-backed implementation, then verify that tasks survive process restart and that API and CLI behavior remains unchanged.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Scope: Introduce a durable storage backend (e.g., SQLite file-based store) implementing the same public surface as the current in-memory TaskStore (add, get, list, complete, delete). Keep the in-memory store available (e.g., as a default for tests) but wire a persistent implementation as the default runtime store used by API/CLI. Preserve constructor signature compatibility where practical; document any unavoidable break.
Acceptance criteria:
- Tasks survive process restart when using the durable store.
TaskStorepublic method signatures unchanged (or documented deviations called out).- API and CLI work unmodified against the new store.
Notes: Prefer stdlib sqlite3 to avoid new dependencies unless the team decides otherwise.
Context:
- Parent: #4
- Size: M
- Owner: Backend
- Depends On: —
Part of the plan accepted for #4.
Related to #4
Generated by 🤖 Squad for #4 · copilot · auto · 54.9 AIC · ⌖ 26.1 AIC · ⊞ 19.7K · ◷
Comment /squad to run again
Add this agentic workflow to your repo
To install this agentic workflow, run
gh aw add bradygaster/squad/workflows/squad.md@bb5380b1ab5ceeb7d2ef3b3b0df4c364f9cada45
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from bradygaster/squad-e4-validation
-
squad squad:docs
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
squad squad:tester
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 66/100
-
squad squad:backend
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
squad squad:backend
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
bradygaster/squad-e4-validation#4 · 14 comments ·
All issues in bradygaster/squad-e4-validation
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Arekkazu/sgpmp-backend#744 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agent/reviewer
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
projectbluefin/utah-packages#634 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement good first issue help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
home-assistant/core#188613 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
WebsiteOpengood first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 91/100
TanbirRamim/open-source-radar#314 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day