MT6890/0x992 Nokia Gateway 2: target config 0xe5, DA1 rejected with DAA 0x7017
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- embedded-iot, security
Research direction
Start by reading issues #88, #302, and #404 and tracing where mtkclient authenticates DA1 versus where Carbonara and HeapBait run; the issue names these boundaries but no source files or tests. Check whether supported read-only commands or existing 0x992 payloads can answer the questions without exposing ME_ID. Done means documenting the supported path or confirming that matching Nokia authentication is required, with evidence from reproducible sanitized logs.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Device
- Nokia FastMile 5G Gateway 2
- Model:
5G19-01W-A - Part number:
3TG02241AABA - Carrier: Safaricom (Kenya)
- SoC: MT6880/MT6890 / T750, HW code
0x992 - Storage: 3.38 GiB BIWIN eMMC (same geometry reported by another exact unit)
- Host: macOS, device enumerates as
0e8d:0003in BROM automatically
The gateway stopped booting after a power cycle. It has no Wi-Fi or Ethernet service and always enters BROM. Factory reset has no effect. I am trying to make a read-only eMMC backup before attempting recovery.
BootROM security state
HW code: 0x992
HW subcode: 0x8a00
HW version: 0xca01
SW version: 0x1
Target config: 0xe5
SBC: true
SLA: false
DAA: true
SWJTAG: true
Mem read auth: true
Mem write auth: true
Cmd 0xC8: blocked
The ME_ID is intentionally omitted but is available privately if it is technically useful.
Results so far
- BROM handshake and target-config reads are repeatable.
- Generic Kamakiri payload (
generic_patcher_payload.bin, 0x538 bytes) is transmitted, but does not execute/respond afterDone sending payload. - The generic
MTK_DA_V6.bincontains an exact0x992entry, but DA1 is rejected with0x7017 DAA_Security_Error. - Fibocom's official
auth_sv5.authfor the FM350/T750 family is rejected with0x7009. - A BlueNokia/Motorola
auth_sv5candidate is also rejected with0x7009. - The eMMC-capable Quectel
DA_BR.binused successfully with SP Flash Tool on the unprotected device in #302 is available and verified, but the Nokia rejects it at the same pre-DA authentication boundary.
Relevant existing issues appear to cover different boundaries:
- #88: MT6880/MT6890 DA support; examples are target config
0x0or a protected Fibocom unit with its matching auth. - #302: same IDs and eMMC, but target config
0x0. - #404: another
0x7017case, but MT6897 rather than0x992.
Questions
- Is there any supported pre-DA exploit path for MT6890/T750
0x992with target config0xe5, or is an OEM-matching Nokia auth/signed DA1 strictly required? - Can Carbonara or HeapBait help in this situation? From the current code, both appear to run only after an accepted DA1, so I assume they cannot cross this boundary.
- Is there a useful read-only command that can identify the expected root certificate/auth signer without exposing the device ME_ID?
- Are there newer
0x992payloads or branches worth testing before moving to direct eMMC ISP recovery?
No write or erase operation has been attempted. I can provide sanitized debug logs, DA hashes and repeat tests on macOS if useful.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.5k
- Forks
- 309
- Avg merge
- 1d 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from bkerler/mtkclient
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 80/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
bkerler/mtkclient#378 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
bkerler/mtkclient#351 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in bkerler/mtkclient
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
ida-arbeitszeit/workers-control#1578 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
aws-samples/sample-per-model-bedrock#898 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
intake mcp-intake needs-human-review priority:high
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
Ikalus1988/MisakaNet#5041 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 86/100