.exceptions.UnhandledRPCError: Execution error: missing required active authority: Missing Active Authority
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- blockchain, python
- Domain
- api, blockchain
Research direction
Compare the create_asset and Asset_create calls with the transfer operation, focusing on the imported wallet keys and the difference between the cli_wallet API via NodeRPC and the witness API. Reproduce the missing active authority error and determine what authority or request detail is absent; done means the cause is documented or asset creation works through the intended API.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Good afternoon! I am developing operations for my version of the blockchain based on Bitshares-Core. I decided to switch to a new version of Python-Bitshares. After calling the "create_asset" method (or trying to send the "Asset_create" operation), an execution error "Execution error: missing required active authority: Missing Active Authority" constantly occurs. I imported the keys into my wallet. For example, the "transfer" operation works correctly. The operations are successfully performed via the cli_wallet API (I send requests via NodeRPC), but there are problems with the witness API.. What could be the problem?
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 162
- Forks
- 164
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from bitshares/python-bitshares
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 55/100
bitshares/python-bitshares#331 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
bitshares/python-bitshares#316 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
bitshares/python-bitshares#315 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
bitshares/python-bitshares#314 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
bitshares/python-bitshares#308 · 6 comments ·
All issues in bitshares/python-bitshares
Similar issues
-
essnmx good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · 1 comment ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Openarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·