(let [[opts args] [maybe-opts args args]] ...) is still correct but confusing, maybe rm doppelgänger?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 62/100
Research direction
Read src/babashka/process.cljc around line 321 and inspect the let binding mentioned in the issue. Determine whether the confusing duplicate binding can be removed without changing behavior; done means the binding is clearer or simplified and existing behavior remains intact.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
And thank you for the great product!
- Dominant language
- Clojure
- Stars
- 251
- Forks
- 35
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from babashka/process
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 30/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 45/100
All issues in babashka/process
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
.Team/Metabot Priority:P3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
needs triage
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
scalar-labs/scalar-jepsen#222 · 1 comment ·