Bedrock Runtime: raise the 64-character tool-name limit for MCP interoperability
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
Research direction
No SDK file or test is identified because the report describes a Bedrock Runtime service-side constraint rather than a Python serialization issue. Reproduce the request using Converse with a 65-character toolSpec.name, then review the linked ToolSpecification API documentation; done means the service supports the requested longer names or documents a supported aliasing mechanism.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
Amazon Bedrock Runtime Converse limits toolConfig.tools[].toolSpec.name to 64 characters. Modern MCP clients qualify tool names with a server or application namespace, which can make otherwise valid tool names exceed this limit and cause Bedrock to reject the entire request before inference.
Please consider raising the Bedrock Runtime tool-name limit to at least 128 characters, or providing another service-supported mechanism for stable long-name aliases.
This is a Bedrock Runtime service API compatibility request rather than an SDK serialization bug. It is being filed here because the AWS SDK for Python currently targets Bedrock Runtime and provides a public AWS-owned feedback tracker.
Use case: Codex Apps over Bedrock
OpenAI Codex exposes app tools through MCP using model-visible names shaped like:
mcp__codex_apps__<tool_name>
The namespace consumes 17 characters, leaving only 47 characters for the individual tool name under the Bedrock limit.
Codex originally normalized MCP names to 64 bytes. OpenAI PR #39594 raised that limit to 128 bytes to match the OpenAI Responses API. Consequently, names between 65 and 128 characters are valid in Codex but fail when an OpenAI-compatible gateway forwards the request to Bedrock Runtime.
The Codex regression and reproduction details are tracked here:
https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/46188
Original Codex name-length issue and changes:
- https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/1289
- https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/1571
- https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/39594
Reproduction
- Invoke Bedrock Runtime
Conversewith a model that supports tool use. - Include a
toolSpec.namecontaining 65 valid ASCII characters. - Bedrock rejects the request with a
ValidationExceptionindicating that the member length must be less than or equal to 64.
The same failure occurs when one codex_apps MCP name exceeds the limit because Bedrock validates the complete tool configuration before model execution.
API constraint:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/bedrock/latest/APIReference/API_runtime_ToolSpecification.html
Expected behavior
Ideally, Bedrock Runtime would accept tool names of at least 128 characters consistently across:
ToolSpecification.nameSpecificToolChoice.name- returned
toolUse.namevalues - tool names replayed in conversation history
If the runtime limit cannot be raised, a documented service-supported aliasing or capability-negotiation mechanism would help clients avoid provider-specific request failures.
Current workaround
A proxy deterministically shortens names to 64 characters, preserves uniqueness with a hash suffix, and reverse-maps returned tool calls to their original MCP names. This works but requires every client or gateway to implement its own bidirectional mapping.
Related AWS-owned reports currently work around the same constraint by shortening names rather than changing the Runtime limit:
- https://github.com/aws/bedrock-agentcore-starter-toolkit/issues/308
- https://github.com/awslabs/mcp/issues/2395
Environment
- Client: OpenAI Codex CLI 0.153.2 / Codex Apps MCP tools
- Backend: Amazon Bedrock Runtime through an OpenAI-compatible gateway
- Platform: macOS
- SDK applicability: service-side constraint; reproducible through any AWS SDK exposing
Converse
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 171
- Forks
- 24
- Avg merge
- 10h 47m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from aws/aws-sdk-python
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
aws/aws-sdk-python#13 ·
-
Support Python 3.11 Open
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
aws/aws-sdk-python#92 ·
-
announcement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
aws/aws-sdk-python#90 ·
-
announcement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
aws/aws-sdk-python#84 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
aws/aws-sdk-python#18 ·
All issues in aws/aws-sdk-python
Similar issues
-
essnmx good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · 1 comment ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Openarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·