Feature-Fluid Compute Pricing
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- aws
- Domain
- cloud
Research direction
Start by reviewing the linked AWS Lambda roadmap issues and the Vercel Fluid Compute Pricing documentation. The issue does not name files, tests, or an implementation entry point; first establish the intended pricing model, scope, and relationship to those existing issues. Done would require an accepted product and implementation direction, not a self-contained code change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Note
- Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
- Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do * not help prioritize the request
If you are interested in providing additional feedback, please leave a comment
Description
When calling 3rd party services such as LLMs, the lambda sits blocked on the network read, which customers are charged for, while that CPU is very likely doing other useful work. This at least is my understanding, and this doesn't seem right.
Vercel has added a variant of this called 'Fluid Compute Pricing' (on top of Lambda??): https://vercel.com/docs/functions/usage-and-pricing
Lambda should natively support this! And better i'm sure.
Additional context
Some of the other issues might be related to this in theory so happy to see this closed if other use cases take on this fundamental shift;
https://github.com/aws/aws-lambda-roadmap/issues/57
https://github.com/aws/aws-lambda-roadmap/issues/16
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 196
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from aws/aws-lambda-roadmap
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
aws/aws-lambda-roadmap#101 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
aws/aws-lambda-roadmap#100 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 28/100
aws/aws-lambda-roadmap#97 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
aws/aws-lambda-roadmap#96 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
aws/aws-lambda-roadmap#95 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
All issues in aws/aws-lambda-roadmap
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
level/task module/gcp type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
bug needs-triage service/elbv2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#50100 · 1 comment ·