force new enums for pinMode and pinStatus to 8 bits type instead of default int
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 18/100
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- embedded-iot
Research direction
Start by finding the PinMode and PinStatus enum declarations in the ArduinoCore-API API, then assess the source- and binary-compatibility consequences across existing Arduino code. Done requires a project decision on whether the proposed uint8_t underlying types are acceptable; the issue itself recommends against production adoption.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
I've seen
typedef enum {
LOW = 0,
HIGH = 1,
CHANGE = 2,
FALLING = 3,
RISING = 4,
} PinStatus;
typedef enum {
INPUT = 0x0,
OUTPUT = 0x1,
INPUT_PULLUP = 0x2,
INPUT_PULLDOWN = 0x3,
} PinMode;
This will let the compiler decide how big the backend storage needs to be for those, and it will default to an int (16 or 32 bit depending on architecture). There is no need for this waste of memory and it prevents also some compiler optimization
I suggest forcing the uint8_t type, 256 values should be plenty to represent a pinMode or a pinStatus..
proposed changes:
typedef enum : uint8_t {
LOW = 0,
HIGH = 1,
CHANGE = 2,
FALLING = 3,
RISING = 4,
} PinStatus;
typedef enum : uint8_t {
INPUT = 0x0,
OUTPUT = 0x1,
INPUT_PULLUP = 0x2,
INPUT_PULLDOWN = 0x3,
} PinMode;
but in practice I would vote against getting these changes in production. There is no value added and tons of unwanted consequences for existing code out there to make this worthwhile.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 306
- Forks
- 150
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from arduino/ArduinoCore-API
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
arduino/ArduinoCore-API#261 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 30/100
arduino/ArduinoCore-API#256 ·
-
enhancement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
arduino/ArduinoCore-API#251 · 1 comment ·
-
enhancement
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
arduino/ArduinoCore-API#250 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
arduino/ArduinoCore-API#249 ·
All issues in arduino/ArduinoCore-API
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
AXERA-TECH/ax-llm#77 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
games-on-whales/wolf#509 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
bug-unconfirmed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
NVIDIA/cuda-samples#453 ·