Bug: dynamic_partition_overwrite silently skips spec-0 manifests after partition spec evolution
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 70/100
Research direction
Start in table/init.py at Table.dynamic_partition_overwrite, then trace _build_partition_projection and the manifest-pruning change from #3011. Reproduce the mixed spec-0/spec-1 snapshot described in the issue and compare with the prior related fix in #1108. Done means a regression test confirms overwriting removes matching rows from both historical specs without deleting unrelated data.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
dynamic_partition_overwrite produces incorrect results when a table has undergone
partition spec evolution. Manifests written under older specs are silently skipped
by the manifest pruning logic introduced in #3011, leaving stale data files that
should have been deleted.
Root cause
In Table.dynamic_partition_overwrite (table/__init__.py), the delete predicate
is built using only the current partition spec:
delete_filter = self._build_partition_predicate(
partition_records=partitions_to_overwrite,
spec=self.table_metadata.spec(), # always current spec
schema=self.table_metadata.schema()
)
A snapshot with mixed partition_spec_ids (spec-0 and spec-1 manifests) passes
this single predicate to _DeleteFiles. The manifest evaluator in _build_partition_projection
uses inclusive_projection(schema, spec) — when projecting a spec-1 predicate
(e.g. category=A AND region=us) through spec-0 (which only has category), the
region reference has no corresponding partition field, causing the evaluator to
incorrectly skip spec-0 manifests entirely.
Reproduction
import tempfile, pyarrow as pa
from pyiceberg.catalog import load_catalog
from pyiceberg.schema import Schema
from pyiceberg.types import NestedField, StringType, LongType
from pyiceberg.partitioning import PartitionSpec, PartitionField
from pyiceberg.transforms import IdentityTransform
schema = Schema(
NestedField(1, "category", StringType(), required=False),
NestedField(2, "region", StringType(), required=False),
NestedField(3, "value", LongType(), required=False),
)
spec_v0 = PartitionSpec(
PartitionField(source_id=1, field_id=1000, transform=IdentityTransform(), name="category")
)
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as warehouse:
catalog = load_catalog("test", **{"type": "sql", "uri": f"sqlite:///{warehouse}/catalog.db", "warehouse": f"file://{warehouse}"})
catalog.create_namespace("default")
table = catalog.create_table("default.test", schema=schema, partition_spec=spec_v0)
# Write under spec 0
table.append(pa.table({"category": ["A","A","B"], "region": [None,None,None], "value": [1,2,10]}))
# Evolve spec
with table.update_spec() as u:
u.add_field("region", IdentityTransform(), "region")
table = catalog.load_table("default.test")
# Write under spec 1
table.append(pa.table({"category": ["A","B"], "region": ["us","us"], "value": [100,200]}))
# Overwrite category=A — should delete ALL A rows (both specs)
table.dynamic_partition_overwrite(
pa.table({"category": ["A"], "region": ["us"], "value": [999]})
)
result = table.scan().to_arrow().to_pydict()
a_values = [v for c,v in zip(result["category"], result["value"]) if c == "A"]
print(a_values) # BUG: prints [1, 2, 100, 999] — stale rows from spec-0 not deleted
# EXPECTED: [999]
Fix
Build the delete predicate per historical spec present in the snapshot, projecting
the new data files' partition values into each spec's coordinate space before evaluating.
PR with fix and regression tests to follow.
Related
- #3011 (introduced the manifest pruning optimization)
- #1108 (prior related fix by @Fokko for spec evolution in manifest rewriting)
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 589
- Avg merge
- 2d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 70
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from apache/iceberg-python
-
kind:bug
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
apache/iceberg-python#4006 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
apache/iceberg-python#3996 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
apache/iceberg-python#3979 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
apache/iceberg-python#3885 ·
-
[Bug] PyArrowFileIO fails to propagate s3.ssl.ca-cert to pyarrow.fs.S3FileSystem tls_ca_file_path Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
apache/iceberg-python#3866 · 1 comment ·
All issues in apache/iceberg-python
Similar issues
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
canonical/paas-charm#368 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
tech debt
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3256 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
qualcomm/qai-appbuilder#275 ·