How to serialize POCOs to a Table?
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- csharp
- Domain
- data-engineering
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by surveying the Apache.Arrow .NET APIs for constructing a Table and any existing serialization helpers; done means establishing and documenting a recommended way to serialize a list of POCOs, or defining the scope of a new helper.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Describe the enhancement requested
Arrow seems like a great system for working with data once you already have some Arrow-format data to work with, but trying to reach that point seems needlessly complicated. For a system dedicated to batch processing of data, you'd expect that one of the most fundamental operations would be to take a list of POCO data objects and serialize it to a Table. But if there's any serializer in the Apache.Arrow library, or even any helpers that would be useful for building one, I can't find them anywhere.
What's the recommended way to serialize a list of objects to a Table?
Moved from https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/40302.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 41
- Forks
- 31
- Avg merge
- 1d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 15
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from apache/arrow-dotnet
-
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
apache/arrow-dotnet#410 · 4 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
ArrowArrayConcatenator: null arrays are refused, and dictionary arrays lose their dictionaryPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
apache/arrow-dotnet#446 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 38/100
apache/arrow-dotnet#409 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
apache/arrow-dotnet#397 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
apache/arrow-dotnet#378 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in apache/arrow-dotnet
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
shimat/opencvsharp#2154 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
subsystem: UI
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Open-Systems-Pharmacology/PK-Sim#3812 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
ClientIdGenerator.Random() only yields 16 distinct client ids (MaxSafeInteger uses XOR, not exponentiation)Possibly taken @makcgr claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
C: Syntax
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100