关于UMM训练的问题
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Active
- Domain
- machine-learning
Research direction
The issue asks whether UMM understanding and generation use separate models or continue training from shared weights, but it names no file, test, or entry point. Start by locating the repository's UMM training instructions or implementation; done means this training-flow question is answered clearly in the project documentation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
请问最后训UMM的时候 理解和生成是两个单独的模型吗 还是说先训理解 然后训生成的时候在理解的权重上接着训呢
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 23
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Similar issues
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
instance instance add
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
searxng/searx-instances#941 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
FluidNumerics/fluid-walk-blocker#89 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day