Option for moving the AI Disclosure to the Top of the Page
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- frontend
Research direction
No files or tests are named. Start by locating the current AI disclosure rendering and the extension settings entry point, then trace how game listing content is positioned. Done means adding a setting that places the disclosure at the top of the page while preserving the existing bottom placement when the option is disabled.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Considering that Steam have been adding games where AI was used on their work, I thought that perhaps some people might prefer that the disclosure is at the top of the page as opposed to the bottom of the game's listing (which is how it's right now by default).
This would be included as an option on the Extension's settings (where or not this would be enabled by default, is up for debate).
Some people don't like purchasing games that may have AI, or they would like to know what things were made with AI before deciding in purchasing or not. Due to this, I believe that if it were to be on the top of the page, people would make a decision first before even watching videos and the screenshots from the page.
I did a quick mock-up on how I thought it could look like (size not final, colors suggested):
Thanks!
Describe the solution you'd like
Bring the AI disclosure information to the top of the page instead of being at the bottom of the game's description, for more clear visibility.
Describe alternatives you've considered
None that I can think of.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 1.2k
- Forks
- 98
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from SteamDatabase/BrowserExtension
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
SteamDatabase/BrowserExtension#283 · 1 comment ·
-
enhancement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
SteamDatabase/BrowserExtension#279 · 1 comment · 3 reactions ·
-
enhancement
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
All issues in SteamDatabase/BrowserExtension
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Maintainers usually reply within 3 days
-
Add: Atlas TVOpenchannels:add check:passed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
Maintainers usually reply within 4 days
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
jaegertracing/jaeger-ui#4547 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
feedback simulation workshop
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4090 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug deck: add to staging level: missing p-feature: Manage Submissions p-feature: Submissions and process priority: MUST HAVE ready for dev lead role: missing size: missing time sensitive
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 67/100
hackforla/tdm-calculator#3581 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days