Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

State of Neuropixels support in SpikeGadgets/Trodes

Open
#444 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
45/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Quiet
Tech stack
python
Domain
data

Research direction

Start with read_spikegadgets_neuropixels and the device mappings in configuration.cpp:5246-5291, then compare the NP2.0 work in #441 and the corresponding Trodes source. Done means the missing variants have validated remappings backed by a real recording or XML companion fixture, rather than source-only extrapolation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

With #441 (NP2.0 support, currently in review), read_spikegadgets_neuropixels covers three of the seven (device, deviceSubType) pairs Trodes recognises (configuration.cpp:5246-5291):

(device, deviceSubType) Status
("neuropixels1", "10") supported (NP1.0 standard)
("neuropixels2", "1_SHANK") supported via #441 (extrapolated, not yet fixture-verified)
("neuropixels2", "4_SHANK") supported via #441 (fixture-verified)
("neuropixels1", "HD") missing (NP1.0 High Density)
("neuropixels1", "NHP_SHORT") missing
("neuropixels1", "NHP_MEDIUM") missing
("neuropixels1", "NHP_LONG") missing
("neuropixelsNRIC", ...) missing (different device, separate dispatch path)

The bottleneck for the missing variants is that SpikeGadgets .rec files do not record the IMEC probe part number, so we can only resolve down to a family ((device, deviceSubType)) rather than to a specific SKU. If SpikeGadgets surfaced the part number from the probe's EEPROM the way SpikeGLX and the Open Ephys neuropixels-pxi plugin already do, several of the missing variants would land automatically as one-line dispatch entries.

In the meanwhile, we could read the Trodes source and implement similar remappings. But I would like to wait for users who have a real recording or an XML companion they can share as test data; without one I do not want to extrapolate, since each variant has enough edges to make a from-source-only implementation likely to be subtly wrong. Please leave a comment with the variant you record on and we can take it from there.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
85
Forks
49
Avg merge
13h 47m
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from SpikeInterface/probeinterface

All issues in SpikeInterface/probeinterface

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.