Agent-mode npm apply, apply --check and vex skip a declared workspace member whose directory is named build, dist, vendor, tmp, temp or coverage, so its nested copy stays unpatched while VEX attests not_affected
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
A pull request for this has already been merged.
- #1628 by @mikolalysenko — merged
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
Research direction
Start with crates/socket-patch-core/src/crawlers/npm_crawler.rs, especially SKIP_DIRS and workspace_children near line 2965; compare with bun_workspace_pattern_members_sync near line 768 and read docs/ecosystems.md for the crawl contract. Reproduce with the packages/build workspace from the issue, then check apply, apply --check, and vex. Done means declared members in skipped-name directories are crawled and their installed copies are handled consistently by all three commands.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
[agent] Found by the scheduled npm bug-hunt routine (ledger #302).
Summary
The npm crawler's workspace walk prunes every directory named dist, build, coverage, tmp, temp, __pycache__ or vendor (SKIP_DIRS). It does this even when the root package.json workspaces field declares that directory as a member, and npm installs it from the root lock. When npm can't hoist a member's dependency (a version conflict with the root), npm installs it into <member>/node_modules/. A member at packages/build, packages/dist, tools/build or vendor/lib is common in real monorepos, and its nested copy is then never crawled. As a result:
applypatches the other copies and prints1 of 1 targeted patch applied, 0 … not found on disk. The member's copy stays unpatched with no warning.apply --checkreportsPatches are in sync.vexattestsnot_affected/inline_mitigations_already_existfor the product.- At runtime, Node resolves the member's own unpatched copy (
require.resolve('ms')from the member →<member>/node_modules/ms/index.js).
Impact
The tool reports a false security attestation (VEX not_affected) and a passing CI audit (apply --check), while a vulnerable copy that npm installed from the project's own lock runs in production code. Nothing warns about it.
Repro (Linux, npm 10.9.4 / Node 22; same on npm 8.19.4 and npm 12.2.1 / Node 24)
mkdir ws && cd ws && mkdir -p packages/app packages/build
echo '{"name":"root","version":"1.0.0","private":true,"workspaces":["packages/*"],"dependencies":{"ms":"2.1.3"}}' > package.json
echo '{"name":"app","version":"1.0.0","dependencies":{"ms":"2.0.0"}}' > packages/app/package.json
echo '{"name":"build","version":"1.0.0","dependencies":{"ms":"2.0.0"}}' > packages/build/package.json
npm install
# -> node_modules/[email protected], packages/app/node_modules/[email protected], packages/build/node_modules/[email protected]
# Stage a .socket/manifest.json + blobs for pkg:npm/[email protected] that appends a marker to index.js
# (a hand-staged agent manifest; any real [email protected] patch behaves the same)
socket-patch apply
# Summary: 1 of 1 targeted patch applied, 0 already patched, 0 not found on disk
grep -c socket-patched packages/app/node_modules/ms/index.js # 1 (patched)
grep -c socket-patched packages/build/node_modules/ms/index.js # 0 (UNPATCHED)
socket-patch apply --check # Patches are in sync (1 patch checked). exit 0
socket-patch vex --product pkg:npm/[email protected] -O vex.json # statement: not_affected
(cd packages/build && node -p "require.resolve('ms')") # …/packages/build/node_modules/ms/index.js (unpatched)
If you rename packages/build to packages/lib, both copies are patched (control).
Expected vs actual
- Expected: CLI_CONTRACT (
apply --check) says "each installed copy hashes to the record'safterHash", and drift is exit 1. docs/ecosystems.md ("npm: whichnode_modulestrees are crawled") says the scan collects "everynode_modulesfound in the directories below it (workspace members, nested projects)". The name-based prune is meant for build-output / cache dirs ("well-known non-workspace dirs" in the code comment), not for a directory thatworkspacesdeclares and that npm installs into from the root lock. At a minimum, the crawler should never letvexattestnot_affectedwhile such a copy is unpatched. - Actual: declared members whose directory names are in
SKIP_DIRSare skipped silently byapply,apply --check, agentscanandvex.
Matrix (agent mode, main 657fce2)
| OS | npm / Node | member dir | apply patches member copy | apply --check |
vex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | 10.9.4 / 22.22.0 | packages/build |
no | in sync (wrong) | not_affected (wrong) |
| Linux | 10.9.4 / 22.22.0 | packages/dist |
no | in sync (wrong) | not_affected (wrong) |
| Linux | 10.9.4 / 22.22.0 | vendor/lib |
no | in sync (wrong) | not_affected (wrong) |
| Linux | 10.9.4 / 22.22.0 | tools/build |
no | in sync (wrong) | not_affected (wrong) |
| Linux | 8.19.4 / 22.22.0 | packages/build |
no | in sync (wrong) | not_affected (wrong) |
| Linux | 12.2.1 / 24.22.0 | packages/build |
no | in sync (wrong) | not_affected (wrong) |
| Linux | 10.9.4 | packages/lib (control) |
yes | in sync | not_affected (correct) |
Release v5.0.1 (npm @socketsecurity/socket-patch) behaves the same, so this is not a regression since the last release. Not tested this run: hosted and vendored modes, which rewire from the lock rather than the crawl; macOS / Windows (probe branches are currently blocked for this routine, but the walk is OS-independent).
Suspect code
crates/socket-patch-core/src/crawlers/npm_crawler.rs:21(SKIP_DIRS)crates/socket-patch-core/src/crawlers/npm_crawler.rs:2965(workspace_children, which appliesSKIP_DIRSwithout consulting the rootpackage.jsonworkspacesglobs; the crate already expands those globs for Bun inbun_workspace_pattern_members_sync, around line 768)
The crawler is shared by the other JS package managers, so pnpm / yarn / Bun workspaces with a member at such a path probably behave the same. This report is scoped to npm.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 19h 5m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 649
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from SocketDev/socket-patch
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:npm priority:p3 ux
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1072 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Nightly Windows test shards fail on temp-path spelling (RUNNER~1 vs canonical \\?\ paths)Possibly taken @mikolalysenko claimed this 1 day ago. Openagent:claimed agent:triaged ci-janitor priority:p3
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1689 · 4 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
CI perf (settings): 90-min merge-queue check timeout let one stuck check freeze main for 77 minOpenagent:needs-human agent:triaged ci-perf priority:p3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 48/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1670 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agent:triaged ci-janitor priority:p3
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1665 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
agent:needs-human agent:triaged ci-janitor priority:p3
Difficulty 4/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 18/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1660 · 4 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in SocketDev/socket-patch
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
farion1231/cc-switch#8829 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug ci good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
longbridge/gpui-kit#3677 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
E-pr-welcome
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
seanmonstar/reqwest#3121 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100
ilya-zlobintsev/LACT#1235 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day