XSUAA to AMS clarification
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Active
- Domain
- authorization, cloud, documentation
Research direction
Start by tracing how Work Zone roles and site assignments relate to the SCI application’s AMS policy tab, then compare the XSUAA, AMS, and IAS user-assignment concepts mentioned in the issue. Done means documenting where AMS fits, whether role collections remain necessary, and how reusable IAS groups can be assigned without manual per-user setup.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
The workzone integration is not clear
since we don't rely anymore on role template and role collection, everything is configured in the SCI application under the AMS policy tab.
In Work Zone, you still need to assign your Fiori apps to roles (which translate to RC in the BTP cockpit) and then you need to assign those roles to your site.
I don't see where AMS fits here? If I still need to managed role collection than maybe it's easier to stick with XSUAA
also AMS user assignment, it looks like you have to assign user 1 by 1, what about IAS reusable user group, like a group of 3K of users, I don't want to assign 3000 users to every app policy manually
thanks
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 100
- Forks
- 41
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from SAP-samples/btp-developer-guide-cap
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
SAP-samples/btp-developer-guide-cap#135 · 1 comment ·
-
FPM - Add Custom Action - GeoMap - InitialPosition not workingMay be free again @navinkrishnan claimed this 454 days ago, and no pull request is open. Open
SAP-samples/btp-developer-guide-cap#130 · 1 assignee ·
All issues in SAP-samples/btp-developer-guide-cap
Similar issues
-
The `ufw` decoder requires the kernel's monotonic timestamp, so UFW lines read from journald decode without any fieldPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
calagopus/panel#285 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
needs-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
manaflow-ai/cmux#32617 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
ossf/wg-best-practices-os-developers#1193 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
laaielichter/Gulliver#22 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day