DF Reference FAQ for object Service can't be a MultiValue field
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
Research direction
Reproduce the missing field using OTOBO 11.0.5, ServiceCatalog 11.0.2, and FAQ 11.0.2 with a Service dynamic field referencing an FAQ article and marked MultiValue. Trace the Service and FAQ dynamic-field handling first; done means the field label and its input are both rendered for this configuration.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
When you create a new DF for the object "Service" (so I'm not sure if this is in the right repository, as it concerns both) Reference to FAQ-Article, and you mark it as a MultiValue-Field, the field-label is still there, but the field itself is gone.
OTOBO 11.0.5
ServiceCatalog 11.0.2
FAQ 11.0.2
- Dominant language
- Perl
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 6
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from RotherOSS/FAQ
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
tidy code
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
bug good first issue
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
Similar issues
-
documentation Needs Triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
objectionary/eolang.sty#159 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
corazawaf/coraza-nginx#140 · 4 comments ·
-
1.severity: security
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100